RESEARCH PAPER
Variations in physical activity of male and female students from the Ukraine in health-promoting life style
 
More details
Hide details
1
Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education, Biała Podlaska, Poland
 
2
Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education, Biała Podlaska, Poland; Lesya Ukrainka Eastern European National University, Lutsk, Ukraine
 
 
Corresponding author
Józef Bergier   

Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education, Biała Podlaska, Poland
 
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24(2):217-221
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
A large-scale research was performed concerning issues relating to physical activity as an important factor in a healthy lifestyle and involved observing the differences among males and females as future elites of the Ukraine.

Objective:
The objective of the research is to assess the physical activity of students from the Ukraine, considering such factors as: gender, leisure time, time spent sitting, sports performed or intended to be performed, and the BMI.

Material and Methods:
The extended version of the IPAQ, supplemented with 3 original questions by the authors, was applied to a 2,125-strong student group from 12 majors of the University of Luck, Ukraine.

Results:
Students from Ukraine portrayed a positive picture of physical activity with significantly higher values in male students of both total activity and its fields, i.e. sports activity and work (studying). The male students performed better in their fitness (condition) self-assessment and the amount of time spent sitting, whereas the female students had better BMI results. Both genders differed considerably in their choice of sport-recreational activities.

Conclusions:
Females more than males demonstrated lower indices of participation in physical activity, which did not permit the formulation of a positive assessment of their lifestyle. A positive phenomenon is the normal BMI and trace values of overweight in women, exactly the reverse to males.

 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Shephard RJ, Aoyagi Y. Objective monitoring of physical activity in older adults: clinical and practical implications. Phys Therapy Rev. 2010; 15: 170–182.
 
2.
Atallach L, Leong JJ, Lo B, et al. Energy expenditure prediction using a miniaturized ear-worn sensor. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43: 1369–1377.
 
3.
Feedson P, Bowles HR, Troiano R, Haskell W. Assessment of physical activity using wearable monitors: recommendations for monitor calibration and use in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012; 44(1 Suppl 1): 1–4.
 
4.
Drabik J. Aktywność, sprawność i wydolność fizyczna jako miernik zdrowia człowieka AWF Gdańsk 1996 (in Polish).
 
5.
Jegier A., Stasiołek D. Skuteczna dawka aktywności ruchowej w prewencji pierwotnej chorób układu krążenia i promocji zdrowia. Medicina Sportiva 2001;5 (suplement 2): 109–118 (in Polish).
 
6.
Osiński W. Antropomotoryka. AWF Poznań 2003 (in Polish).
 
7.
Janssen I. Physical activity guidelines for children and youth. Can J Public Health. 2007; 98 (Suppl 2): S109–21.
 
8.
World Health Organization. Global recommendations on physical activity for health. Geneva, Switzerland, WHO Press, 2010.
 
9.
Global health risks morality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2009.
 
10.
Lee IM, Paffenbarger RS. Associations of light, moderate, and vigorous intensity physical activity. The Harvard Alumni Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 151: 293–9.
 
11.
Niźnikowska E, Stępień E. Physical activity of the students from universities in Biała Podlaska in their free time according to the chosen faculties. Health Problems of Civilization. 2015; 9: 13–18.
 
12.
Booth ML. Assessment of Physical Activity: An International Perspective. Res Quart Exerc Sport. 2000; 71: S114–20.
 
13.
Gómez LF, Duperly J, Lucumí DI, et al. Physical activity levels in adults living in Bogota (Columbia): prevalence and associated factors. Gac Sanit. 2005; 19: 206–213.
 
14.
Hallal PC, Victora CG, Wells JC, et al. Physical activity: prevalence and associated variables in Brazilian adults. Med Sci Sport Exer. 2003; 35: 1894–1900.
 
15.
Ainsworth BE, Macera CA, Jones DA, et al. Comparison of the 2001 BRFSS and the IPAQ Physical Activity Questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006; 38: 1584–1592.
 
16.
Suchomel A, Sigmundova D, Frömel K. The lifestyle of the inhabitants of the Liberec region. Human Movement. 2008; 9: 19–26.
 
17.
Roman-Vinas B, Serra-Majem L, Hagstromer M, et al. International Activity Questionnaire: Reliability and validity in a Spanish population. Eur J Sport Sci. 2010; 10: 297–304.
 
18.
Sebastiao E, Gobbi S, Chodzko-Zajko W, et al. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-long form overestimates, self-reported physical activity of Brazilian adults. Public Health. 2012; 126(11): 967–975.
 
19.
Pedišić Ž, Rakovac M, Bennie J, Jurakić D, Bauman AE. Levels and correlates of domain-specific physical activity in university students: Cross-Sectional Findings from Croatia. Kinesiology 2014; 46(1): 12–22.
 
20.
Biernat E. Aktywność fizyczna mieszkańców Warszawy. Na przykładzie wybranych grup zawodowych. Szkoła Główna Handlowa 2010 (in Polish).
 
21.
Bergier J, Kapka-Skrzypczak L, Biliński P, et al. Physical activity of Polish adolescents and young adults according to IPAQ: a population based study. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 1: 109–115.
 
22.
Mynarski W, Rozpara M, Królikowska B, et al. Jakościowe i ilościowe aspekty aktywności fizycznej. Oficyna Wydawnicza PO, Opole 2012.
 
23.
Dąbrowska-Galas M., Plinta R., Dąbrowska J., Skrzypiec-Plinta V. Physical Activity in Students of the Medical University of Silesia in Poland. Physical Therapy . March 2013; 93(3): 384–392.
 
24.
Pańczyk W. Aktywność fizyczna mieszkańców południowo-wschodnich regionów Polski u progu XXI wieku. In: Nowocień J, Chełmecki J. eds. Społeczno-edukacyjne oblicza współczesnego sportu i olimpizmu: aktywność fizyczna dzieci, młodzieży i dorosłych na przełomie XX i XXI wieku. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Warszawie. Polska Akademia Olimpijska, Fundacja „Centrum Edukacji Olimpijskiej”: 2010;30–143.
 
25.
Mynarski W, Rozpara M, Nawrocka A, et al. Physical activity of middle-age adults aged 50–65 years in view of health recommendations. Eur Rev Aging Physical Activity. 2014; 11: 141–147.
 
26.
Mynarski W, Rozpara M, Czapla K, et al. Aerobic Capacity of students with Different Levels of Physical Activity as Assessed by IPAQ. J Hum Kinet. 2009; 21: 89–96.
 
27.
Soguksu K. Physical activity level between Polish and Turkish university students (IPAQ). In: Bergier B, ed. Physical activity in health and disease. Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biała Podlaska; 2011:19–27.
 
28.
Frömel K, Novosad J, Svozil Z, et al. School youth physical activity. In: Valkova H, Hanelova Z, eds. Movement and health. Univerzita Palckeho, Olomouc; 1999:29–33.
 
29.
Wojciechowski L, Bergier M. Physical activity of the Biała Podlaska prison staff and its conditioning factors. Health Problems of Civilization . 2016;10:47–56.
 
30.
Bergier B, Bergier J, Wojtyła A. Various aspects of physical activity among Lithuanian adolescents. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19:825–829.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top