EDITORIAL
The substantial differences between photoallergic and phototoxic reactions
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
 
 
Corresponding author
Radosław Śpiewak   

Department of Experimental Dermatology and Cosmetology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
 
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012;19(4):888-889
 
ABSTRACT
Re: Jakubowicz O, Żaba C, Nowak G, Jarmuda S, Żaba R, Marcinkowski JT. Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19(2): 327-328. With great interest, yet growing concern, I read the article published by Jakubowicz et al. in a recent issue of the journal AAEM, in which the authors addressed phototoxic reactions caused by Heracleum sosnowskyi. Without any doubt, this is a relevant challenge to public health in Poland, for the plant is spreading across the country in an uncontrolled way and people exposed to this plant and sunlight may suffer severe adverse cutaneous reactions. However, the scientifically incorrect terminology used by the authors throughout this article cannot be left without comment, as it fosters misunderstandings about this very important topic.
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Jakubowicz O, Żaba C, Nowak G, Jarmuda S, Żaba R, Marcinkowski JT. Heracleum sosnowskyi Manden. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19(2): 327-328.
 
2.
Oppenheim M. Dermatitis striata pratensis bullosa (grass or meadow dermatitis). Arch Derm Syphilol. 1942; 46(4): 541-551.
 
3.
Schempp CM, Schopf E, Simon JC. Dermatitis bullosa striata pratensis durch Ruta graveolens L. (Gartenraute). Hautarzt. 1999; 50(6): 432-434.
 
4.
Kuske H. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Photosensibilisierung der Haut durch pflanzliche Wirkstoffe. I Mitteilung. Lichtsensibilisierung durch Furocumarine als Ursache verschiedener phytogener Dermatosen. Arch Derm Syph. 1938; 178(2): 112-123.
 
5.
Epstein JH. Phototoxicity and photoallergy. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1999; 18(4): 274-284.
 
6.
Pathak MA, Fitzpatrick TB. Relationship of molecular configuration to the activity of furocoumarins which increase the cutaneous responses following long wave ultraviolet radiation. J Invest Dermatol. 1959; 32(2): 255-262.
 
7.
Śpiewak R. Contact dermatitis in atopic individuals. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 12(5): 491-497.
 
8.
Śpiewak R, Dutkiewicz J. Occupational airborne and hand dermatitis to hop (Humulus lupulus) with non-occupational relapses. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2002; 9(2): 249-252.
 
9.
Neumann NJ, Blotz A, Wasinska-Kempka G, Rosenbruch M, Lehmann P, Ahr HJ, Vohr HW. Evaluation of phototoxic and photoallergic potentials of 13 compounds by different in vitro and in vivo methods. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2005; 79(1): 25-34.
 
10.
Śpiewak R. Fotoalergie. Post Dermatol Alergol. 2009; 26(5): 347-34.
 
11.
Śpiewak R. Fotoalergie. Post Dermatol Alergol. 2009; 26(5): 347-349.11. Śpiewak R. Pathomechanisms of phototoxic dermatitis. In: Śpiewak R (ed.). Photoallergy and Photopatch Testing. Krakow, Institute of Dermatology, 2009. p. 20-22.
 
12.
Śpiewak R. Pathomechanisms of photoallergic dermatitis. In: Śpiewak R (ed.). Photoallergy and Photopatch Testing. Krakow, Institute of Dermatology, 2009. p. 23-26.
 
13.
Hölzle E, Lehmann P, Neumann N. Phototoxic and photoallergic reactions. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2009; 7(7): 643-649.
 
14.
Śpiewak R. Pesticides and skin diseases in man. In: Rathore H, Nolet LM (eds.). Pesticides: Evaluation of Environmental Pollution. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2012. p. 525-542.
 
15.
Śpiewak R. Systemic photoallergy to terbinafine. Allergy. 2010; 65(8): 1071-1072.
 
16.
Emmert B, Schauder S, Palm H, Hallier E, Emmert S. Disabling work-related persistent photosensitivity following photoallergic contact dermatitis from chlorpromazine and olaquindox in a pig breeder. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2007; 14(2): 329-333.
 
17.
Kerr AC, Muller F, Ferguson J, Dawe RS. Occupational carprofen photoallergic contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2008; 159(6): 1303-1308.
 
18.
The European Multicentre Photopatch Test Study (EMCPPTS) Taskforce. A European multicentre photopatch test study. Br J Dermatol. 2012; 166(5): 1002-1009.
 
19.
Szewczyk K, Śpiewak R. ‘Sun allergy’ or photodermatoses: how frequent are they in Poland? Allergy. 2009; 64(Suppl 90): 280.
 
20.
Śpiewak R. Indications and results of photopatch tests among patch tested patients. Contact Dermatitis. 2012; 66(Suppl 2): 42.
 
21.
Śpiewak R. Food-provoked eczema: A hypothesis on the possible role of systemic contact allergy to haptens present in both cosmetics and foods. Estetol Med Kosmetol. 2011;1 (1): 35-40.
 
22.
Diffey B. The contribution of medical physics to the development of psoralen photochemotherapy (PUVA) in the UK: a personal reminiscence. Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51(13): R229-R244.
 
23.
Śpiewak R. Pesticides as a cause of occupational skin disease in farmers. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2001; 8(1): 1-5.
 
24.
Śpiewak R. Occupational dermatoses among Polish private farmers, 1991-1999. Am J Ind Med. 2003; 43(6): 647-655.
 
25.
Śpiewak R. Farmers and farm workers. In: Elsner P, John SM, Maibach HI, Rustemeyer T (eds.). Kanerva’s Occupational Dermatology. Heidelberg, Springer, 2012. p. 1425-1441.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top