Online first
Current issue
Archive
Special Issues
About the Journal
Publication Ethics
Anti-Plagiarism system
Instructions for Authors
Instructions for Reviewers
Editorial Board
Editorial Office
Contact
Reviewers
All Reviewers
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
General Data Protection Regulation (RODO)
RESEARCH PAPER
Sero-epidemiological study of Lyme disease among high-risk population groups in eastern Slovakia
1
Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Faculty of Medicine, University of P. J. Šafárik, Košice, Slovakia
2
Clinic of Infectology and Travel Medicine, L. Pasteur University Hospital, Košice, Slovakia
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(4):632-636
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
The aim of the presented cross-sectional sero-epidemiological study was to determine the current presence of antibodies against B. burgdorferi s.l. in the high-risk groups of the Slovak population, and to identify potential risk factors to LB infections.
Material and Methods:
A group of 277 agricultural and forestry workers – persons with frequent stay in the countryside and employees of State Border and Customs Police – from years 2011–2012 in the Eastern Slovakia were examined in order to assess the seroprevalence of anti-Borrelia antibodies. Sera were screened by commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The study subjects completed a questionnaires with general demographic, epidemiological and clinical data. The results were evaluated statistically.
Results:
A 25.3% presence of positive and 8.7% presence of borderline IgG antibodies was detected in all investigated groups. The seroprevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l was significantly higher (P<0.05) among the agricultural and forestry workers when compared to employees of State Border and Customs Police. Higher seropositivity was observed in older subjects over 30 years of age (P=0.004) than those who were younger, and also in males (P=0.045). A significant number of persons with rheumatologic conditions was statistically higher (P=0.020) in the group with seropositivity than in the group with seronegativity.
Conclusions:
The presented study confirms the higher risk of Borrelia infection in individuals with frequent exposure to ticks in eastern Slovakia. The seropositivity tests confirmed the highest seropositivity in agriculture and forestry workers, middle positivity was confirmed among other sector workers, and lowest positivity in policemen and employees of the Customs and Border Inspection. The outputs also simultaneously filling the gap of missing seroprevalence data among these exposed groups.
The aim of the presented cross-sectional sero-epidemiological study was to determine the current presence of antibodies against B. burgdorferi s.l. in the high-risk groups of the Slovak population, and to identify potential risk factors to LB infections.
Material and Methods:
A group of 277 agricultural and forestry workers – persons with frequent stay in the countryside and employees of State Border and Customs Police – from years 2011–2012 in the Eastern Slovakia were examined in order to assess the seroprevalence of anti-Borrelia antibodies. Sera were screened by commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The study subjects completed a questionnaires with general demographic, epidemiological and clinical data. The results were evaluated statistically.
Results:
A 25.3% presence of positive and 8.7% presence of borderline IgG antibodies was detected in all investigated groups. The seroprevalence of B. burgdorferi s.l was significantly higher (P<0.05) among the agricultural and forestry workers when compared to employees of State Border and Customs Police. Higher seropositivity was observed in older subjects over 30 years of age (P=0.004) than those who were younger, and also in males (P=0.045). A significant number of persons with rheumatologic conditions was statistically higher (P=0.020) in the group with seropositivity than in the group with seronegativity.
Conclusions:
The presented study confirms the higher risk of Borrelia infection in individuals with frequent exposure to ticks in eastern Slovakia. The seropositivity tests confirmed the highest seropositivity in agriculture and forestry workers, middle positivity was confirmed among other sector workers, and lowest positivity in policemen and employees of the Customs and Border Inspection. The outputs also simultaneously filling the gap of missing seroprevalence data among these exposed groups.
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Dehnert M, Fingerle V, Klier C, Talaska T, Schlaud M, Krause G, Wilking H, Poggensee G. Seropositivity of Lyme borreliosis and associated risk factors: a population-based study in children and adolescents in Germany (KiGGS). PLoS One. 2012; 7(8): e41321.
2.
Chmielewska-Badora J, Moniuszko A, Żukiewicz-Sobczak W, Zwoliński J, Piątek J, Pancewicz S. Serological survey in persons occupationally exposed to tick-borne pathogens in cases of co-infections with Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Bartonella spp. and Babesia microti. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19(2): 271–274.
3.
Buczek A, Rudek A, Bartosik K, Szymanska J, Wojcik-Fatla A. Seroepidemiological study of Lyme borreliosis among forestry workers in southern Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2009; 16(2): 257–261.
4.
Rizzoli A, Hauffe H, Carpi G, Vourc H G, Neteler M, Rosa R. Lyme borreliosis in Europe. Euro Surveill. 2011; 16(27): 1–8.
5.
Štefančíková A, Peťko B, Rozická I, Salyova N, Ohlasová D. Epidemiological survey of human borreliosis diagnosed in Eastern Slovakia. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2001; 8(2): 171–175.
7.
Biesiada G, Czepiel J, Leśniak MR, Garlicki A, Mach T. Lyme disease: review. Arch Med Sci. 2012; 8(6): 978–982.
8.
Kaya AD, Parlak AH, Ozturk CE, Behcet M. Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi infection among forestry workers and farmers in Duzce, north-western Turkey. New Microbiol. 2008; 31(2): 203–209.
9.
Gajović O, Todorović Z, Nesić L, Lazić Z. Lyme borreliosis – diagnostic difficulties in interpreting serological results. Med Pregl. 2010; 63(11–12): 839–843 (in Serbian).
10.
Bazovská S, Macháčová E, Špaleková M, Kontrošová S. Reported incidence of Lyme disease in Slovakia and antibodies to B. burgdorferi antigens detected in healthy population. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2005; 106(8–9): 270–273.
11.
Di Renzi S, Martini A, Binazzi A, Marinaccio A, Vonesch N, D’Amico W, Moro T, Fiorentini C, Ciufolini MG, Visca P, Tomao P. Risk of acquiring tick-borne infections in forestry workers from Lazio, Italy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010; 29(12): 1579–1581.
12.
Bazovská S, Guryčová D, Výrosteková V, Jareková J, Bakoss P, Macháčová E, Špaleková M. Antibodies against the causative agents of some natural focal infections in blood donor sera from Western Slovakia. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2010; 59(4): 168–171 (in Slovak).
13.
Cisak E, Chmielewska-Badora J, Zwoliński J, Wójcik-Fatla A, Polak J, Dutkiewicz J. Risk of tick-borne bacterial diseases among workers of Roztocze National Park (south-eastern Poland). Ann Agric Environ Med. 2005; 12(1): 127–132.
14.
Zwoliński J, Chmielewska-Badora J, Cisak E, Buczek A, Dutkiewicz J. Prevalence of antibodies to Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi in forestry workers from the Lublin region. Wiad Parazytol. 2004; 50(2): 221–227 (in Polish).
15.
Cisak E, Zając V, Wójcik-Fatla A, Dutkiewicz J. Risk of tick-borne diseases invarious categories of employment among forestry workers in eastern Poland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012; 19(3): 469–474.
16.
Rojko T, Ruzić-Sabljić E, Strle F, Lotric-Furlan S. Prevalence and incidence of Lyme borreliosis among Slovene forestry workers during the period of tick activity. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2005; 117(5–6): 219–225.
17.
Arteaga F, Golightly MG, Garcia Perez A, Barral M, Anda P, Garcia-Monco JC. Disparity between serological reactivity to Borrelia burgdorferi and evidence of past disease in a high-risk group. Clin Infect Dis. 1998; 27(5): 1210–1213.
18.
Zhioua E, Rodhain F, Binet P, Perez-Eid C. Prevalence of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi in forestry workers of Ile de France, France. Eur J Epidemiol. 1997; 13(8): 959–962.
19.
Bartůnek P, Gorican K, Veiser T, Mrázek V, Varejka P, Hulínská D. The information value of detection of borrelia antibodies in the healthy blood donors and in the population at risk. Cas Lek Cesk. 2007; 146(7): 603–607 (in Czech).
20.
Werner M, Nordin P, Arnholm B, Elgefors B, Krantz I. Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies in outdoor and indoor workers in south-west Sweden. Scand J Infect Dis. 2001; 33(2): 128–131.
21.
Aslan Başbulut E, Gözalan A, Sönmez C, Cöplü N, Körhasan B, Esen B, Akın L, Ertek M. Seroprevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi and tick-borne encephalitis virus in a rural area of Samsun, Turkey. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2012; 46(2): 247–256 (in Turkish).
22.
Vázquez M, Muehlenbein C, Cartter M, Hayes EB, Ertel S, Shapiro ED. Effectiveness of personal protective measures to prevent Lyme disease. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008; 14(2): 210–216.
23.
Cinco M, Barbone F, Grazia Ciufolini M, Mascioli M, Anguero Rosenfeld M, Stefanel P, Luzzati R. Seroprevalence of tick-borne infections in forestry rangers from northeastern Italy. Clin MicrobiolInfect. 2004; 10(12): 1056–1061.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1898-2263 |
| ISSN: | 1232-1966 |
Improvement of visual identification of the journal - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
