RESEARCH PAPER
Rehabilitation – definition for research purposes
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Rehabilitation, Centre for Postgraduate Medical Education, Otwock, Poland
 
2
Faculty of Applied Linguistics, University of Warsaw, Poland
 
3
Department of Rehabilitation, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland
 
4
Foundation for Active Rehabilitation ‘FAR’, Warsaw, Poland
 
5
Division of Physiology, Department of Physiological-Medical Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland
 
6
Department of Lung Diseases and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
 
7
Department of Speech and Language Therapy and Applied Linguistics, Marie Curie University, Lublin, Poland
 
8
Department for Occupational Therapy, Institute for Applied Science, University of Physical Education, Kraków, Poland
 
9
KinesisMed Orthotics & Prosthetics, Poland
 
10
Institute of Micromechanics and Photonics, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland
 
11
Rehabilitation Department with Early Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, St Hedvig the Queen Regional Teaching Hospital No 2 in Rzeszów, Poland
 
12
Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Infant Jesus Teaching Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
 
13
Rehabilitation Center for Children and Youth, St Hedvig the Queen Regional Teaching Hospital No 2 in Rzeszów, Poland
 
14
Zamość Rehabilitation Clinic, Poland
 
15
Department of General and Neurological Rehabilitation, Witold Chodźko Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
 
16
Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland
 
 
Corresponding author
Piotr Tederko   

Department of Rehabilitation, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Księdza Stanisława Konarskiego 13, 05-400, Otwock, Poland
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
The Rehabilitation Definition for Research Purposes (RDRP), published in 2022 by Cochrane Rehabilitation, addresses discrepancies resulting from the multiplicity and heterogeneity of rehabilitation definitions hitherto used in the contexts of science, health, and social/legal aspects. The RDRP, based on the paradigm of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health, provides clear-cut criteria for what rehabilitation includes and excludes. The final version of the RDRP achieved brad agreement among global stakeholders.

Material and methods:
The translation methodology satisfied recommendations established by the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section and Board of the European Union of Medical Specialists. The translating group was composed of representatives of all professions constituting the rehabilitation team reflecting the specifics of the practice of rehabilitation, persons with disability, and linguist professionals.

Results:
The article presents the Polish version of the RDRP, established through consensus among a broad representation of professions involved in rehabilitation and end users of rehabilitation.

Conclusions:
RDRP may aid 1) researchers carrying original research and compiling original reports, by helping them to correctly define rehabilitation interventions; 2) authors of review papers, by providing clear-cut criteria for papers being considered for inclusion as concerned with rehabilitation; 3) those responsible for developing rehabilitation programmes in health care; 4) clinicians, in making decisions related to prevention, diagnosis and treatment.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors express their appreciating of comments and invaluable support from the UEMS PRM Section PPC, especially the roles of Dr. Carlotte Kiekens, Prof. Catarina Aguiar Branco and Prof. Aydan Oral. The project was supported by the Main Board of the Polish Rehabilitation Society. Polish version of the article is available from the Corresponding Author upon request.
 
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Negrini S, Arienti C, Gimigliano F, et al. Cochrane Rehabilitation: Organization and Functioning. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;97(1):68–71. doi:10.1097/PHM.0000000000000832.
 
2.
Levack WM, Rathore FA, Negrini S. Expert opinions leave space for uncertainty when defining rehabilitation interventions: analysis of difficult decisions regarding categorization of rehabilitation reviews in the Cochrane library. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56:661–6. doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06615-0.
 
3.
Meyer T, Kiekens C, Selb M, et al. Toward a new definition of rehabilitation for research purposes: a comparative analysis of current definitions. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56:672–81. doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06610-1.
 
4.
Arienti C, Patrini M, Pollock A, et al. A comparison and synthesis of rehabilitation definitions used by consumers (Google), major Stakeholders (survey) and researchers (Cochrane Systematic Reviews): a terminological analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56:682–9. doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06583-1.
 
5.
Negrini S, Arienti C, Küçükdeveci A, et al. Current rehabilitation definitions do not allow correct classification of Cochrane systematic reviews: an overview of Cochrane reviews. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56:667–71. doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06585-5.
 
6.
Negrini S, Selb M, Kiekens C, et al. Rehabilitation definition for research purposes. A global stakeholders’ initiative by Cochrane Rehabilitation. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022;58(3):333–341. doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07509-8.
 
7.
Centrum Informacyjne Systemów Ochrony Zdrowia. Międzynarodowa Klasyfikacja Funkcjonowania, Niepełnosprawności i Zdrowia. (2010) Online: https://www.cez.gov.pl/fileadm... (access: 25-08-2023).
 
8.
Neumann V, Gutenbrunner C, Fialka-Moser V, et al. Interdisciplinary team working in physical and rehabilitation medicine. J Rehabil Med. 2010 Jan;42(1):4–8. doi:10.2340/16501977-0483.
 
9.
ICF Research Branch c/o Swiss Paraplegic Research. Introduction to ICF-based Documentation Tools and Rehab-Cycle). Online https://www.icf-casestudies.or... (access: 25.11.2023).
 
10.
World Health Organization. World Bank. World report on disability. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
 
11.
Krug E, Cieza A. Strengthening health systems to provide rehabilitation services. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95:167. doi:10.2471/BLT.17.191809.
 
12.
Meyer T, Gutenbrunner C, Bickenbach J, et al. Towards a conceptual description of rehabilitation as a health strategy. J Rehabil Med. 2011;43:765–9. doi:10.2340/16501977-0865.
 
13.
Wade DT. Describing rehabilitation interventions. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:811–8. doi:10.1191/0269215505cr923ed.
 
14.
Wade DT. What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description. Clin Rehabil. 2020;34:571–83. doi:10.1177/0269215520905112.
 
15.
Lubecki M. Polski model rehabilitacji medycznej zaakceptowany i zalecany przez WHO. Hygeia Public Health. 2011;46(4):506–515.
 
16.
Tederko P, Krasuski M, Łyp M, et al. Perception of the role of physical and rehabilitation medicine among physiotherapy students. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50:661–667. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2360.
 
17.
Tederko P, Krasuski M, Denes Z, et al. What medical doctors and medical students know about physical medicine and rehabilitation: a survey from Central Europe. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016;52(5):597–605.
 
18.
Tederko P, Mycielski J, Angerova Y, et al. Role of diversity in assembling of rehabilitation teams in Central Europe. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020;56(2):131–141. doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.20.05904-3.
 
19.
Zampolini M, Selb M, Boldrini P, et al. The Individual Rehabilitation Project as the core of person-centered rehabilitation: the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section and Board of the European Union of Medical Specialists Framework for Rehabilitation in Europe. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022;58(4):503–10. doi:10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07402-0.
 
20.
Stucki G, Bickenbach J, Gutenbrunner C, et al. Rehabilitation: The health strategy of the 21st century. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(4):309–316. doi:10.2340/16501977-2200.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top