RESEARCH PAPER
Psychosocial factors and health status of employees at the Poznan University of Medical Sciences
More details
Hide details
1
Occupational Medicine, Clinic Private Health Care, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland
2
Chair of Social Medicine, Department of Hygiene, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(3):539-543
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
New opportunities in the labour market, competition in services and globalization have contributed to the increase in load factors in the psychosocial work environment. Availability, readiness to help, work with the sick, the suffering patient – night shifts, overtime, workaholic (as a new form of addiction), and bullying – are becoming more pronounced causes of stress, fatigue and burnout in medicine. Thus, difficult working conditions are largely the cause of unhealthy lifestyles in the medical professions and foster the development of various types of addiction and physical illness. The negative effects of psychosocial factors – in the form of immune disorders, increased incidence of mental and somatic diseases, and metabolic and hormonal disorders – more often cause increase absence through sickness and the shortening of working life.
Objective:
The main aim of the presented study was to provide results concerning the health state of employees of the Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PUMS), and also to analyze relations between selected psychosocial risks factors and the state of health of PUMS employees.
Material and Methods:
The results of research conducted in 2009–2010 which covered 2,468 employees of the PUMS and the results of studies using an anonymous own questionnaire survey, evaluating exposure to psychosocial factors, which included the 1,096th members of staff of the PUMS.
Results:
There was a clear effect of psychosocial risk factors for health workers. The greatest burden of these factors was observed among workers with higher education, mostly doctors. This occupational group also worked in several places of work more often than other employees of the university. These workers often complained of chronic fatigue, recurrent respiratory infections, hypertension, sleep disorders, neurotic disorders and depression. The complaints quite often diagnosed were immune disease, allergies, skin diseases, gastrointestinal diseases, and disorders of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, which clearly intensified under stress. The clearest negative impact of psychosocial factors on the health of the workers were observed in those a with higher education, employed at several jobs, and complained about poor work organization.
Conclusions:
1) It is necessary to implement prevention programs for the staff of the PUMS, aimed at the primary and secondary negative impact of psychosocial factors. 2) Psychological counseling is advisable for employees. 3) It is essential that the issue of voice training, and interpersonal communication techniques to teach and control the schedule of classes, in order to reduce the workload, and encourage physical activity and other forms of relaxation. 4) It is advisable to periodically check on the work conditions and organization of work to help eliminate stressors in the work environment.
REFERENCES (18)
1.
Informacje Europejskiej Agencji Bezpieczeństwa i Zdrowia w Pracy: Wzrasta liczba osób dotkniętych skutkami nadmiernego stresu w miejscu pracy. Med Pr. 2008; 59(1): 89–91.
3.
Dollard MF, McTernan W. Psychosocial safety climate: a multilevel theory of work stress in the health and community service sector. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2011 Dec; 20(4): 287–93.
4.
Mias A. Work which is making us ill. Rev Infirm. 2011 Nov; 175: 14–6.
5.
Tripodi D, Roedlich C, Laheux MA, Longuenesse C, Roquelaure Y, Lombrail P, Geraut C. Stress perception among employees in a French University Hospital. Occup Med (Lond). 2012; 62(3): 216–9.
6.
Warchał M. Ocena ryzyka zawodowego – czynniki psychospołeczne. PIP – Główny Inspektorat Pracy, Departament Prewencji i Promocji – raport, Warszawa 2010: 3–6 [in Polish].
7.
Merecz D, Waszkowska M. Informacja na temat zagrożeń psychospołecznych w środowisku pracy w Polsce – wykład. IMP, Łódź 2010 [in Polish].
8.
Dudek B, Waszkowska M. Wpływ czynników psychospołecznych na stan zdrowia pracujących. In: Byczkowska Z, Dawydzik L. (ed). Medycyna pracy w praktyce lekarskiej. IMP, Łódź 1999: 198–206 [in Polish].
9.
Moryś J. Psychologiczne czynniki w reakcjach immunologicznych. In: Borys B, Majkowicz M. (ed.). Psychologia w medycynie. UM, Gdańsk 2006 [in Polish].
10.
Jurkowski MK. Komórki cytotoksyczne (NK) a psychologia. Psychoonkologia, 2002; 6(4): 103–109 [in Polish].
11.
Freyberger HJ, Schneider W, Stiglitz R. Kompendium psychiatrii, psychoterapii, medycyny psychosomatycznej. PZWL, Warszawa 2005; 13: 174–175,179 [in Polish].
12.
Wang JH, Yu SF. A study of the impact of occupational stress on sleep disorders among male freight train dispatchers. Chin J Ind Hyg Occup Dis. 2011 Aug; 29(8): 603–5.
13.
Yu SF, Gu GZ, Zhou WH, Zhou SY, Yang XF, Sun SY: Gender difference of relationship between occupational stress and depressive symptoms. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2011 Dec; 29(12): 887–92.
14.
Rabin S, Shorer Y, Nadav M, Guez J, Hertzanu M, Shiber A. Burnout among general hospital mental health professionals and the salutogenic approach. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2011; 48(3): 175–81.
15.
Pezé M. Psychosocial risks, symbols of uneasiness and suffering at work. Rev Infirm. 2011; 175: 19–21.
16.
Bugajska J, Zołnierczyk-Zreda D, Jedryka-Góral A. The role of psychosocial work factors in the development of musculoskeletal disorders in workers. Med Pr. 2011; 62(6): 653–8.
17.
Odéen M, Westerlund H, Theorell T, Leineweber C, Eriksen HR, Ursin H. Expectancies, Socioeconomic Status, and Self-Rated Health: Use of the Simplified TOMCATS Questionnaire. Int J Behav Med. 2013; 20(2): 242–51.
18.
Potocka A. Co wiemy o psychospołecznych zagrożeniach w środowisku pracy? Med Pr. 2010; 61(3): 341–352 [in Polish].