Online first
Current issue
Archive
Special Issues
About the Journal
Publication Ethics
Anti-Plagiarism system
Instructions for Authors
Instructions for Reviewers
Editorial Board
Editorial Office
Contact
Reviewers
All Reviewers
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
General Data Protection Regulation (RODO)
RESEARCH PAPER
Parasitological contamination of arable soil in selected regions of Poland – preliminary study
1
Department of Parasitology and Invasive Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute – State Research Institute, Puławy, Poland
2
Department of Health Biohazards and Parasitology, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Plant Nutrition and Fertilization, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation State Research Institute, Puławy, Poland
4
Department of Soil Science Erosion and Land Protection, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation State Research Institute, Puławy, Poland
Corresponding author
Jolanta Małgorzata Zdybel
Department of Parasitology and Invasive Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute – State Research Institute, 57 Partyzantow Avenue, 24-100, Puławy, Poland
Department of Parasitology and Invasive Diseases, National Veterinary Research Institute – State Research Institute, 57 Partyzantow Avenue, 24-100, Puławy, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2023;30(4):661-668
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
The hygienic status of arable soils in most developed countries has been unknown. In the presented study, a preliminary investigation was undertaken to determine the contamination with eggs of parasitic nematodes in the soil of arable fields in Poland. The aim of the study was to determine whether such contamination is common enough to constitute a significant problem and what factors may influence it.
Material and methods:
The study was conducted in 5 Polish provinces from autumn 2021 to spring 2022. The provinces differed significantly in terms of the area of agricultural land, agricultural suitability, type of soil, scale of cattle and pig breeding, production of manure and slurry, and the use of manures and organic fertilizers for fertilization. A total of 133 soil samples were collected. Parasitological examination of soil samples was carried out using the PN-Z-19006 method [1], with confirmed high sensitivity.
Results:
Parasite eggs were found in a total of 67 samples, of which 56 samples contained eggs of roundworms of the genus Ascaris (an average of 3.29 eggs/100 g of soil), 23 contained eggs of whipworms (an average of 1.22 eggs/100 g), and 3 contained eggs of Toxocara (1 egg/100 g).
Conclusions:
Differences in the percentage of positive samples were found depending on the period in which the samples were taken. The percentage of positive samples collected in autumn (53.57%) was higher than the percentage of positive samples collected in spring (48.05%). Similarly, the average number of eggs of in positive samples collected in autumn (3.43 eggs/100 g) was higher than the average number of eggs in samples collected in spring (2.90 eggs/100 g). Differences in the percentage of positive samples were also found depending on the region of origin of the samples.
The hygienic status of arable soils in most developed countries has been unknown. In the presented study, a preliminary investigation was undertaken to determine the contamination with eggs of parasitic nematodes in the soil of arable fields in Poland. The aim of the study was to determine whether such contamination is common enough to constitute a significant problem and what factors may influence it.
Material and methods:
The study was conducted in 5 Polish provinces from autumn 2021 to spring 2022. The provinces differed significantly in terms of the area of agricultural land, agricultural suitability, type of soil, scale of cattle and pig breeding, production of manure and slurry, and the use of manures and organic fertilizers for fertilization. A total of 133 soil samples were collected. Parasitological examination of soil samples was carried out using the PN-Z-19006 method [1], with confirmed high sensitivity.
Results:
Parasite eggs were found in a total of 67 samples, of which 56 samples contained eggs of roundworms of the genus Ascaris (an average of 3.29 eggs/100 g of soil), 23 contained eggs of whipworms (an average of 1.22 eggs/100 g), and 3 contained eggs of Toxocara (1 egg/100 g).
Conclusions:
Differences in the percentage of positive samples were found depending on the period in which the samples were taken. The percentage of positive samples collected in autumn (53.57%) was higher than the percentage of positive samples collected in spring (48.05%). Similarly, the average number of eggs of in positive samples collected in autumn (3.43 eggs/100 g) was higher than the average number of eggs in samples collected in spring (2.90 eggs/100 g). Differences in the percentage of positive samples were also found depending on the region of origin of the samples.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was supported by the National Centre for Research
and Development (Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwój
– NCBiR), Grant: GOSPOSTRATEG-III/0061/2020–00
OrgSafety: ‘Introduction of a innovative, cheap and
environmentally-friendly method of hygienizing organic
waste, enabling its use in fertilization’.
REFERENCES (50)
1.
Polish Committee for Standardization. 2023. PN-Z-19006:2023-04 Soil quality. Assessment of the sanitary condition of materials introduced into the soil. Detection of eggs of intestinal parasites of the genera Ascaris. Trichuris and Toxocara in organic fertilizers.
2.
Blasco-Costa I, Poulin R. Parasite life-cycle studies: a plea to resurrect an old parasitological tradition. J Helminthol. 2017;91:647–656. doi:10.1017/S0022149X16000924.
3.
Seamster AP. Developmental studies concerning the eggs of Ascaris lumbricoides var. suum. Am Midl Nat. 1950;43:450–470. https://doi.org/10.2307/242191....
4.
Kowalczyk K, Kłapeć T. Contamination of soil with eggs of geohelminths Ascaris spp.. Trichuris spp.. Toxocara spp. in Poland – potential source of health risk in farmers. Ann Parasitol. 2020;66:433–440. doi:10.17420/ap6604.283.
5.
Strauch D. Survival of pathogenic micro-organisms and parasites in excreta. manure and sewage sludge. Rev Sci Tech. 1991;10:813–846. doi:10.20506/rst.10.3.565.
6.
Oliveira FC, de Faria MF, Bertoncini EI, et al. Persistence of fecal contamination indicators and pathogens in class B biosolids applied to sugarcane fields. J Environ Qual. 2019;48:526–530. doi:10.2134/jeq2018.07.0270.
7.
Abe EM, Echeta OC, Ombugadu A, et al. Helminthiasis among school-age children and hygiene conditions of selected schools in Lafia. Nasarawa State. Nigeria. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019;4:12. doi:10.3390/tropicalmed4030112.
8.
Adegoke AA, Amoah ID, Stenstrom TA, et al. Epidemiological evidence and health risks associated with agricultural reuse of partially treated and untreated wastewater: a review. Front Public Health. 2018;6:20. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00337.
9.
Amahmid O, Asmama S, Bouhoum K. Pathogenic parasites in sewage irrigated crops and soil: pattern of occurrence and health implications. Int J Environ Health Res. 2022;32:1594–1608. doi:10.1080/09603123.2021.1898551.
10.
Amato HK, Chang H, Boisson S, et al. Effects of functional latrine density on household drinking water contamination. soil-transmitted helminth infection and diarrhea: a spatial analysis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;95:211–211.
11.
Holland C, Sepidarkish M, Deslyper G, et al. Global prevalence of Ascaris infection in humans (2010–2021): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infect Dis Poverty. 2022;11:113. doi:10.1186/s40249-022-01038-z.
12.
Macchioni F, Segundo H, Totino V, et al. Intestinal parasitic infections and associated epidemiological drivers in two rural communities of the Bolivian Chaco. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016;10:1012–1019. doi:10.3855/jidc.7657.
13.
Jogi NO, Kitaba N, Storaas T, et al. Ascaris exposure and its association with lung function, asthma, and DNA methylation in Northern Europe. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022;149:1960–1969. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2021.11.013.
14.
Miller LA, Colby K, Manning SE, et al. Ascariasis in humans and pigs on small-scale farms. Maine. USA. 2010–2013. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:332–334. doi: 10.3201/eid2102.140048.
15.
Zdybel JM, Sroka J, Karamon J, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of various parasitological methods in detecting nematode eggs in different types of soil. Ann Agr Env Med. 2023;30:425–431. doi:10.26444/aaem/172454.
16.
Avila HG, Sandon L, Anes PE, et al. Environmental Toxocara spp. presence in crowded squares and public parks from San Juan Province. Argentina: A call for a “One Health” approach. Front Med. 2023;10:10. doi:10.3389/fmed.2023.1102396.
17.
de Almeida A, Candido AC, Sousa VRF. Helminths’ larvae in areas of recreation for kindergartens of Cuiaba. Mato Grosso. Semin Cienc Agrar. 2010;31:469–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0....
18.
Dubná S, Langrová I, Jankovská I, et al. Contamination of soil with Toxocara eggs in urban (Prague) and rural areas in the Czech Republic. Vet Parasitol. 2007;144:81–86. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.09.023.
19.
Mizgajska H. Eggs of Toxocara spp. in the environment and their public health implications. J Helminthol. 2001;75:147–151.
20.
Mizgajska H, Jarosz W, Rejmenciak A. Distribution of sources of Toxocara spp. Infection in urban and rural environments in Poland. Wiad Parazytol. 2001;47:399–404.
21.
Shimizu T. Prevalence of Toxocara eggs in sandpits in Tokushima city and its outskirts. J Vet Med Sci. 1993;55:807–811. doi:10.1292/jvms.55.807.
22.
Kłapeć T. Contamination of soil with geohelminth eggs on vegetable organic farms in the Lublin voivodeship. Poland. Wiad Parazytol. 2009;55:405–409.
23.
Skodowski P, Bielska A. Właściwości i urodzajność gleb Polski – podstawą kształtowania relacji rolno-środowiskowych. Woda-Środowisko-Obszary Wiejskie. 2009;9:203–214.
24.
Paller VGV, Babia-Abion S. Soil-transmitted helminth (STH) eggs contaminating soils in selected organic and conventional farms in the Philippines. Parasite Epidemiol. Control. 2019;7:9. doi:10.1016/j.parepi.2019.e00119.
25.
Statistics Poland. Warsaw. 2022. The Agricultural Census 2020. Characteristics of agricultural holdings in 2020.
26.
Polish Committee for Standardization. 1997. PN-R-04031:1997 Chemical and agricultural analysis of soil – Sampling.
27.
Chongsuvivatwong V, Uga S, Nagnaen W. Soil contamination and infections by soil-transmitted helminths in an endemic village in southern Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999;30:64–67.
28.
Schulz S, Kroeger A. Soil contamination with Ascaris lumbricoides eggs as an indicator of environmental hygiene in urban areas of north-east Brazil. J Trop Med Hyg. 1992;95:95–103.
29.
Soriano SV, Barbieri LM, Pierángeli NB, et al. Intestinal parasites and the environment: frequency of intestinal parasites in children of Neuquén. Patagonia. Argentina. Rev Latinoam Microbiol. 2001;43:96–101.
30.
Steinbaum L, Njenga SM, Kihara J, et al. Soil-transmitted helminth eggs are present in soil at multiple locations within households in rural Kenya. PLoS One. 2016;11:10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0157780.
31.
Armstrong WA, Oberg C, Orellana JJ. Presence of parasite eggs with zoonotic potential in parks and public squares of the city of Temuco. Araucania Region. Chile. Arch Med Vet. 2011;43:127–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S030....
32.
Gawor J, Borecka A. Risk of soil-transmitted helminth infections on agritourism farms in central and eastern Poland. Acta Parasitol. 2015;60:716–720. doi:10.1515/ap-2015-0102.
33.
Gawor JK, Borecka A. Quantifying the risk of zoonotic geohelminth infections for rural household inhabitants in Central Poland. Ann Agr Env Med. 2017;24:44–48. DOI: 10.5604/12321966.1230679.
34.
Kleine A, Springer A, Strube C. Seasonal variation in the prevalence of Toxocara eggs on children’s playgrounds in the city of Hanover. Germany. Parasites Vectors 2017;10:8. doi:10.1186/s13071-017-2193-6.
35.
Vladimirovna MT, Dmitrievna BA, Vasil’evich EA. Geohelminths eggs contamination of sandpits in Vladivostok. Russia. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2016;9:1190–1192. doi:10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.11.002.
36.
Zain SNM, Rahman R, Lewis JW. Stray animal and human defecation as sources of soil-transmitted helminth eggs in playgrounds of Peninsular Malaysia. J Helminthol. 2015;89:740–747. doi:10.1017/S0022149X14000716.
37.
Tadege B, Mekonnen Z, Dana D, et al. Assessment of environmental contamination with soil-transmitted helminths life stages at school compounds. households and open markets in Jimma Town. Ethiopia. Plos Neglect Trop Dis. 2022;16:27. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0010307.
38.
Tchakounte BN, Nkouayep VR, Pone JW. Soil contamination rate. prevalence. intensity of infection of geohelminths and associated risk factors among residents in Bazou (West Cameroon). Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018;28:63–72. doi:10.4314/ejhs.v28i1.8.
39.
Katakam KK, Thamsborg SM, Dalsgaard A, et al. Environmental contamination and transmission of Ascaris suum in Danish organic pig farms. Parasites Vectors. 2016;9:80. doi:10.1186/s13071-016-1349-0.
40.
Roepstorff A, Murrell KD, Boes J, et al. Ecological influences on transmission rates of Ascaris suum to pigs on pastures. Vet Parasitol. 2001;101:143–153. doi:10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00506-4.
41.
Yahia SH, Etewa SE, Al Hoot AA, et al. Investigating the occurrence of soil-transmitted parasites contaminating soil. vegetables. and green fodder in the East of Nile Delta. Egypt J Parasitol Res. 2023;16. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6....
42.
Sumbele IUN, Nkemnji GB, Kimbi HK. Soil-transmitted helminths and plasmodium falciparum malaria among individuals living in different agroecosystems in two rural communities in the mount Cameroon area: a cross-sectional study. Infect Dis Poverty. 2017;6:15. doi:10.1186/s40249-017-0266-6.
43.
Avcioglu H, Burgu A. Seasonal prevalence of Toxocara ova in soil samples from public parks in Ankara. Turkey. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:345–350. doi:10.1089/vbz.2007.0212.
44.
Wong MS, Bundy DAP. Quantitative assessment of contamination of soil by the eggs of Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura. Trans Roy Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1990;84:567–570. doi:10.1016/0035-9203(90)90043-e.
45.
Diakou A, Papadopoulos E, Haralabidis S, et al. Prevalence of parasites in intensively managed dairy cattle in Thessaloniki region. Greece. Cattle Practice. 2005;13:51–54.
46.
Kochanowski M, Karamon J, Dąbrowska J, et al. Occurrence of intestinal parasites in pigs in Poland – the Influence of factors related to the production system. J Vet Res. 2017;61:459–466. doi:10.1515/jvetres-2017-0053.
47.
Matsubayashi M, Kita T, Narushima T, et al. Coprological survey of parasitic infections in pigs and cattle in slaughterhouse in Osaka. Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2009;71:1079–1083. doi:10.1292/jvms.71.1079.
48.
Tomczuk K, Szczepaniak K, Demkowska-Kutrzepa M, et al. Occurrence of internal parasites in cattle in various management systems in South-East Poland. Med Wet. 2018;74:501–506. doi:10.21521/mw.6105.
49.
Etewa SE, Abdel-Rahman SA, Abd El-Aal NF, et al. Geohelminths distribution as affected by soil properties. physicochemical factors and climate in Sharkyia governorate Egypt. J Parasit Dis. 2016;40:496–504. doi:10.1007/s12639-014-0532-5.
50.
Mizgajska H. The distribution and survival of eggs of Ascaris suum in six different natural soil profiles. Acta Parasitol. 1993;38:170–174.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1898-2263 |
| ISSN: | 1232-1966 |
Improvement of visual identification of the journal - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
