Online first
Current issue
Archive
Special Issues
About the Journal
Publication Ethics
Anti-Plagiarism system
Instructions for Authors
Instructions for Reviewers
Editorial Board
Editorial Office
Contact
Reviewers
All Reviewers
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
General Data Protection Regulation (RODO)
RESEARCH PAPER
Organized physical activity of secondary school students and university sports science students
1
Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland
2
Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic
3
WSB University, Poland
Corresponding author
Dorota Groffik
The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Mikołowska, 40-065, Katowice, Poland
The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Mikołowska, 40-065, Katowice, Poland
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Organized physical activity (OPA) is an important part of adolescents’ physical activity (PA). The aim of the study is to determine differences between secondary school students and sports science students at the university participation in OPA, and to recommend a strategy to increase the active participation of adolescents in OP, and improve the education of sports specialists.
Material and methods:
The study was carried out continuously during 2010–2020 at 71 secondary schools in the Silesian region and at the Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Poland. A total of 3,510 students participated in the study (2,199 secondary school students and 1,311 sports science students). To determine participation in OPA, the Physical Activity Preference Questionnaire was used, and to determine the level of weekly PA, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used.
Results:
The largest representation in the OPA was in school (21.1%) and university (30.7%) boys in soccer, and in school (13.7%) and university (33.4%) girls in volleyball. Schoolboys participating in OPA ≥5 lessons had statistically significantly more school PA, recreation PA, vigorous and total PA than boys not participating in OPA. University boys and girls were alike in vigorous PA. School (3.35 times) and university (1.73 times) boys and school (3.93 times) and university (5.08 times) girls were more likely to meet the PA recommendations.
Conclusions:
Active participation in the OPA of school and university boys and girls is significantly associated with a higher level of weekly PA, and likelihood to meet the PA recommendations. The greatest attention should focused on promotion of the participation in OPA in non-participating school boys and girls, as well as non-participating students at universities, as part of their professional training.
Organized physical activity (OPA) is an important part of adolescents’ physical activity (PA). The aim of the study is to determine differences between secondary school students and sports science students at the university participation in OPA, and to recommend a strategy to increase the active participation of adolescents in OP, and improve the education of sports specialists.
Material and methods:
The study was carried out continuously during 2010–2020 at 71 secondary schools in the Silesian region and at the Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, Poland. A total of 3,510 students participated in the study (2,199 secondary school students and 1,311 sports science students). To determine participation in OPA, the Physical Activity Preference Questionnaire was used, and to determine the level of weekly PA, the International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used.
Results:
The largest representation in the OPA was in school (21.1%) and university (30.7%) boys in soccer, and in school (13.7%) and university (33.4%) girls in volleyball. Schoolboys participating in OPA ≥5 lessons had statistically significantly more school PA, recreation PA, vigorous and total PA than boys not participating in OPA. University boys and girls were alike in vigorous PA. School (3.35 times) and university (1.73 times) boys and school (3.93 times) and university (5.08 times) girls were more likely to meet the PA recommendations.
Conclusions:
Active participation in the OPA of school and university boys and girls is significantly associated with a higher level of weekly PA, and likelihood to meet the PA recommendations. The greatest attention should focused on promotion of the participation in OPA in non-participating school boys and girls, as well as non-participating students at universities, as part of their professional training.
REFERENCES (63)
1.
Brodáni J, Kováčová N. The interaction of physical activity, joy of movement and quality of life of high school students at different ages. Phys Act Rev. 2019;7:134–142. doi:10.16926/par.2019.07.16.
2.
Wiium N, Säfvenbom R. Participation in organized sports and self-organized physical activity: Associations with developmental factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(4):585. doi:10.3390/ijerph16040585.
3.
Westerbeek H, Eime R. The physical activity and sport participation framework – A policy model toward being physically active across the lifespan. Front Sports Act Living. 2021;3:608593. doi:10.3389/fspor.2021.608593.
4.
World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Physical activity factsheets for the 28 European Union member states of the WHO European Region. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2018.
5.
Aubert S, Barnes JD, Abdeta C, et al. Global Matrix 3.0 physical activity report card grades for children and youth: Results and analysis from 49 countries. J Phys Act Health. 2018;15(S2):S251–S273. doi:10.1123/jpah.2018-0472.
6.
Gába A, Rubín L, Badura P, et al. Results from the Czech Republic’s 2018 report card on physical activity for children and youth. J Phys Act Health. 2018;15(S2):S338–S340. doi:10.1123/jpah.2018-0508.
7.
Frömel K, Groffik D, Chmelík F, et al. Physical activity of 15–17 years old adolescents in different educational settings: A Polish-Czech study. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2018;26(2):137–143. doi:10.21101/cejph.a4521.
8.
Zembura P, Goldys A, Nalecz H. Results from Poland’s 2016 Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13(Suppl 2):S237–S241. doi:10.1123/jpah.2016-0386.
9.
Fairclough SJ, Ridgers ND, Welk G. Correlates of children’s moderate and vigorous physical activity during weekdays and weekends. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(1):129–137. doi:10.1123/jpah.9.1.129.
10.
Frömel K, Kudlacek M, Groffik D, et al. Differences in the intensity of physical activity during school days and weekends in Polish and Czech boys and girls. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016;23(2):357–360. doi:10.5604/12321966.1203905.
11.
Groffik D, Mit áš J, Jakubec L, et al. Adolescents’ physical activity in education systems varying in the number of weekly physical education lessons. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2020;91(4):551–561. doi:10.1080/02701367.2019.1688754.
12.
Chen W, Hammond-Bennett A, Hypnar, A, et al. Health-related physical fitness and physical activity in elementary school students. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):195. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5107-4.
13.
Groffik D, Frömel K, Ziemba M, et al. The association between participation in organized physical activity and the structure of weekly physical activity in Polish adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4). doi:10.3390/ijerph18041408.
14.
Frömel K, Groffik D, Mit áš J, et al. Active travel of Czech and Polish adolescents in relation to their well-being: Support for physical activity and health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):2001. doi:10.3390/ijerph17062001.
15.
Lagestad P, Mikalsen H, Ingulfsvann LS, et al. Associations of participation in organized sport and self-organized physical activity in relation to physical activity level among adolescents. Front. Public Health. 2019;7:129. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00129.
16.
Béghin L, Vanhelst J, Drumez E, et al. Gender influences physical activity changes during adolescence: The HELENA study. Clin Nutr. 2019;38(6):2900–2905. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.12.027.
17.
Ye S, Chen L, Wang Q, et al. Correlates of screen time among 8–19-year-old students in China. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):467. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-5355-3.
18.
Kantzas AA, Venetsanou F. Self-perception of children participating in different organized physical activity programs. Eur Psychomotricity J. 2020;12(1):3–12.
19.
Resaland GK, Aadland E, Moe VF, et al. Effects of physical activity on schoolchildren’s academic performance: The Active Smarter Kids (ASK) cluster-randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2016;91:322–328. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.005.
20.
Beckmann J, Elbe AM. Sport psychology intervention in competitive sports. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 2015.
21.
Mosoi AA, Beckmann J, Mirifar A, et al. Influence of organized vs non organized physical activity on school adaptation behavior. Front Psychol. 2020;11:633197. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.633197.
22.
Naylor PJ, Nettlefold L, Race D, et al. Implementation of school based physical activity interventions: A systematic review. Prev. Med. 2015;72: 95–115. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.034.
23.
Watson A, Timperio A, Brown H, et al. Associations between organised sport participation and classroom behaviour outcomes among primary school-aged children. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0209354. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0209354.
24.
McIntyre F, Chivers P, Larkin D, et al. Exercise can improve physical self perceptions in adolescents with low motor competence. Hum Mov Sci. 2015;42:333–343. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2014.12.003.
25.
Korz A, Monyeki MA. Association between sport participation, body composition, physical fitness, and social correlates among adolescents: The PAHL study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(12):2793. doi:10.3390/ijerph15122793.
26.
Stojmenović T, Ćurčić D, Vuka šinović-Vesić M, et al. Changes in maximal oxygen uptake during growth and development in girls who actively participate in basketball and non-athletes girls: A longitudinal study. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2018;75(5):481–486. doi:10.2298/VSP150901326S.
27.
Lagestad P, Mehus I. The importance of adolescents’ participation in organized sport according to VO2peak: A longitudinal study. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2018;89(2):143–152. doi:10.1080/02701367.2018.1448050.
28.
Ridley K, Zabeen S, Lunnay BK. Children’s physical activity levels during organised sports practices. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(9):930–934. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2018.01.019.
29.
Marques A, Ekelund U, Sardinha LB. Associations between organized sports participation and objectively measured physical activity, sedentary time and weight status in youth. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(2):154–157. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2015.02.007.
30.
Machado-Rodrigues AM, Coelho e Silva MJ, Mota J, et al. Physical activity and energy expenditure in adolescent male sport participants and nonparticipants aged 13 to 16 years. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(5):626–633. doi:10.1123/jpah.9.5.626.
31.
Ala-Kitula A, Peltonen, J, Finni T, et al. Physical activity on days with and without soccer practice in 12–13-year-old boys. Sci Med Footb. 2019;3: 245–250. doi:10.1080/24733938.2018.1562276.
32.
Babický L, Nováková T, Vávra J, et al. Current physical activity and sports history of children 11 to 19 years old at high schools in Prague. AUC Kinanthropologica. 2020;56(2):98–115. doi:10.14712/23366052.2020.10.
33.
Kudlacek M, Fromel K, Groffik D. Associations between adolescents’ preference for fitness activities and achieving the recommended weekly level of physical activity. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2020;18:31–39. doi:10.1016/j.jesf.2019.10.001.
34.
Gorely T, Harrington DM, Bodicoat DH, et al. Process evaluation of the school-based Girls Active programme. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1187. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-7493-7.
35.
Alkhateeb SA, Alkhameesi NF, Lamfon GN, et al. Pattern of physical exercise practice among university students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (before beginning and during college): A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1716. doi:10.1186/s12889-019-8093-2.
36.
García Puello F, Herazo Beltrán Y, Tuesca Molina R. Factores sociodemográficos y motivacionales asociados a la actividad física en estudiantes universitarios [Levels of physical activity among Colombian university students]. Rev Med Chil. 2015;143(11):1411–1418. doi:10.4067/S0034-98872015001100006.
37.
Demirer I, Erol S. The relationships between university students’ physical activity levels, insomnia and psychological well-being. J Psychiatric Nurs. 2020;11(3):201–211. doi:10.14744/phd.2020.46547.
38.
Osipov AY, Potop V, Nagovitsyn RS, et al. Indicators of physical activity and fitness of male students at Russian Universities. Phys Educ Stud. 2020;24(1):40–46. doi:10.15561/20755279.2020.0105.
39.
Bergier J, Tsos A, Popovych D, et al. Level of and factors determining physical activity in students in Ukraine and the Visegrad countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(8):1738. doi:10.3390/ijerph15081738.
40.
Groffik D, Frömel K, Mit áš J, et al. Formative action self-research: Promoting tertiary sport and physical education based on evidence and experience-based approaches. J Phys Educ Sport. 2018;18(S1):434–444, doi:10.7752/jpes.2018.s161.
41.
Zuzda JG, Latosiewicz R, Augustyńska B. Risk assessment and level of physical activity of students in Poland. Phys Educ Stud. 2017;21(4):193–199. doi:10.15561/20755279.2017.0408.
42.
Canikli A. Physical activity and mood responses: Sport sciences students. Prog Nutr. 2021;23(S1):e2021133. doi:10.23751/pn.v23iS1.11423.
43.
Hagströmer M, Bergman P, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Concurrent validity of a modified version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-A) in European adolescents: The HELENA Study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008;32(S5):S42–S48. doi:10.1038/ijo.2008.182.
44.
Ottevaere C, Huybrechts I, De Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Comparison of the IPAQ-A and actigraph in relation to VO2max among European adolescents: The HELENA study. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(4):317–324. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2011.02.008.
45.
Cull A, Sprangers M, Bjordal K, et al. EORTC Quality of Life EORTC Quality of Life Group translation procedure. 2nd ed. Brussels: EORTC, 2002.
46.
Mitáš J, Frömel K, Valach P, et al. Secular trends in the achievement of physical activity guidelines: Indicator of sustainability of healthy lifestyle in Czech adolescents. Sustainability. 2020;12(12):5183. doi:10.3390/su12125183.
47.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2030. 2020. https://health.gov/healthypeop... (access: 2021.5.23).
48.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. 2nd ed. U.S.: Washington (DC) Department of Health and Human Services, 2018.
49.
Frömel K, Groffik D, Mit áš J, Madarasová Gecková A, Csányi T. Physical activity recommendations for segments of school days in adolescents: Support for health behavior in secondary schools. Front Public Health. 2020;8:527442. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.527442.
50.
Hebert JJ, Møller NC, Andersen LB, et al. Organized sport participation is associated with higher levels of overall health-related physical activity in children (CHAMPS Study-DK). PLoS ONE. 2015;10(8):e0134621, doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0134621.
51.
Fröberg A, Lindroo A-K, Ekblom Ö, et al. Organized physical activity during leisure time is associated with more objectively measured physical activity among Swedish adolescents. Acta Pediatric. 2020;109(9):1815–1824. doi.org/10.1111/apa.15187.
52.
Brière FN, Yale-Soulière G, Gonzalez-Sicilia D, et al. Prospective associations between sport participation and psychological adjustment in adolescents. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72(7): 575–581. doi:10.1136/jech-2017-209656.
53.
Eime RM, Young JA, Harvey JT, et al. A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: Informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:98. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-10-98.
54.
Kemp BJ, Cliff DP, Kariippanon KE, et al. ‘Not just for fun anymore’: A qualitative exploration of social norms related to the decline in non-organised physical activity between childhood and adolescence in Australia. Sport Educ Soc. 2020;1–16. doi:10.1080/13573322.2020.1822795.
55.
Hulteen RM, Smith JJ, Morgan PJ, et al. Global participation in sport and leisure-time physical activities: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2017;95:14–25. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.11.027.
56.
Fagaras SP, Radu, LE, Vanvu, G. The level of physical activity of university students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;197:1454–1457. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.094.
57.
Lapa TY. Physical activity levels and psychological well-being: A case study of university students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;186:739–743. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.122.
58.
Chekroud SR, Gueorguieva R, Zheutlin AB, et al. Association between physical exercise and mental health in 1·2 million individuals in the USA between 2011 and 2015: A cross-sectional study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(9):739–746. doi:10.1016/ S2215-0366(18)30227-X.
59.
Kuśnierz C, Zmaczyńska-Witek B, Rogowska AM. Preferences of physical education profiles among Polish adolescents. Front Public Health. 2020;8:466. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00466.
60.
Fin G, Moreno-Murcia JA, León J, et al. Interpersonal autonomy support style and its consequences in physical education classes. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216609. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216609.
61.
Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, et al. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: A pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(1):23–35. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2.
62.
Stalsberg R, Pedersen AV. Are differences in physical activity across socioeconomic groups associated with choice of physical activity variables to report? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(5):922. doi:10.3390/ijerph15050922.
63.
Hillsdon M, Foster C. What are the health benefits of muscle and bone strengthening and balance activities across life stages and specific health outcomes? J Frailty Sarcopenia Falls. 2018;3(2):66–73. doi:10.22540/JFSF-03-066.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1898-2263 |
| ISSN: | 1232-1966 |
Improvement of visual identification of the journal - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
