RESEARCH PAPER
Level of physical activity of students in Poland, Portugal and Belarus
More details
Hide details
1
Medical University, Lublin, Poland
2
Universidade de Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal
3
Yanka Kupala State University, Grodno, Belarus
4
University of Technology, Białystok Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2022;29(1):126-135
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
The WHO term ‘physical activity’ refers to all body movements produced by skeletal muscles which require energy expenditure. The ways to be active include daily activities, exertion in the performance of work, or active recreation. The objective of the study is to compare physical activity of the students of Bialystok University of Technology, Higher School of Physical Education and Tourism in Biaystok (Poland), University of Beira Interior in Covilha (Portugal) and Janka Kupala Grodno State University in Grodno (Belarus).
Material and methods:
A total of 1,136 persons participated in the study (398 men and 738 women). The level of physical activity of the students was assessed on the basis of a short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). The individual value of the body mass index (BMI) was calculated for each respondent.
Results:
Among men studying at WSWFiTB, in Portugal and Belarus, the dominant level of activity was high. Both in the group of men and women, people studying in Portugal spent the most time sitting during one working day. Without taking into account the gender of the respondents, a high level was the dominant among students of WSWFiTB, in Portugal and Belarus. With regard to overweight and obese people, the highest average amount of energy expenditure was recorded in the case of intensive activity.
Conclusions:
Men, compared to women, were characterized by a higher average amount of energy consumption related to total activity and intensive exercise. Students in Belarus obtained the highest average amount of energy expenditure related to moderate and intensive activity, compared to students at BUT, WSWFiTB and in Portugal. A high level of activity dominated both in the group of underweight/normal body weight, as well as overweight and obese persons.
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Vuori I. World Health Organization and Physical Activity. Prog Prev Med. 2018; 3(1): e0012. doi: 10.1097/pp9.0000000000000012.
2.
WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour: Web Annex. Evidence profiles. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2020.
3.
Syed Ali SK. The important of physical activities in our life. Int Phys Med Rehab J. 2018; 3(4): 308?310. doi: 10.15406/ipmrj.2018.03.00121.
4.
Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: more active people for a healthier world. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2018.
5.
Aune D, Schlesinger S, Leitzmann M, et al. Physical activity and the risk of heart failure: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021; 36(4): 367–381. doi: 10.1007/s10654–020–00693–6.
6.
Kruk J. Physical activity and health. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2009; 10(5): 721–728.
7.
Biernat E, Stupnicki R, Gajewski AK. International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) – Polish version. Wych Fiz I Sport. 2007; 51(1): 47–54.
8.
Byrne N, Hills A, Hunter G, et al. Metabolic equivalent: one size does not fit all. J Appl Physiol, 2005; 99(3): 1112–1119. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00023.2004.
9.
Franklin B, Brinks J, Berra K, et al. Using Metabolic Equivalents in Clinical Practice. Am J Cardiol. 2018; 121(3): 382–387. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.10.033.
10.
Holtermann A, Stamatakis E. Do all daily metabolic equivalent task units (METs) bring the same Health benefits. Br J Sports Med. 2019; 53(16): 991–992. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017–098693.
11.
Mendes MA, da Silva I, Ramires V, et al. Metabolic equivalent of task (METs) thresholds as an indicator of physical activity intensity. PLoS One. 2018; 13(7): e 0200701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200701.
12.
Craig C, Marshall A, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(8): 1381–1395. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
13.
Gajewski A, Biernat E. Zastosowanie Międzynarodowego Kwestionariusza Aktywności Fizycznej (IPAQ) – za i przeciw, czyli kilka rozważań metodycznych i ich konsekwencje. In: Buśko K, Charzewska J, Kaczanowski K, editors. Współczesne metody badań aktywności, sprawności i wydolności fizycznej człowieka. Warszawa: Wyd. AWF; 2010. p. 20–37.
14.
Bergier J. About physical activity with the application of the polish version of the international physical activity questionnaire (ipaq) — participation in discussion. Human and Health. 2013; 7(1): 91–98.
15.
Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995; 854: 1–452.
16.
Nuttall F. Body Mass Index. Obesity, BMI, and Health: A Critical Review. Nutr Today. 2015; 50(3): 117–128. doi: 10.1097/NT.0000000000000092.
17.
Díaz-Munoz GA, Pérez Hoyos AK, Cala Liberato DP, et al. Difference in levels of physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, and eating habits among university students from different health programs at a private university in Bogotá, Colombia. Revista Espanola De Nutrición Humana Y Dietética, 2021; 25(1): 8–17.
https://doi.org/10.14306/renhy....
18.
Walentukiewicz A, Łysak A, Wilk B. Health behavior of nursing students. Nursing Problems/Problemy Pielęgniarstwa. 2013; 21(4): 484–488.
19.
Tsos A, Kasarda O, Pantik V, Female students at higher educational Institutions in Ukraine and their level of physical activity. Health Problems of Civilization. 2017; 11(3): 158–162.
https://doi.org/10.5114/hpc.20....
20.
Popovych D, Bergier J, Korda M, et al. Evaluation of physical activity, body mass index and self-assessment of physical fitness in female students and pupils of Ternopil, Western Ukraine. Health Problems of Civilization. 2017; 11(3): 163–172.
https://doi.org/10.5114/hpc.20....
21.
Junger J, Niźnikowska E, Bergier B, et al. A field of study as a factor determining physical activity, BMI, indicator and self-assessment of physical activity of students in the visegrad countries. Health Problems of Civilization 2016; 10(4): 14–25.
https://doi.org/10.5114/hpc.20....
22.
Papathanasiou G, Georgoudis G, Papandreou M, et al. Reliability measures of the short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in Greek young adults. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2009; 50(4): 283–294.
23.
Starościak W, Guła-Kubiszewska H, Kałwa M, et al. Physical activity of students in the era of globalization. Journal of Education. Health and Sport. 2016; 6(13): 96–114. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.233002.
24.
Stepień E, Bergier B, Bergier J, et al. The relationship between the level of physical activity of students and the direction of their studies. Med Sport. 2014; 3(4): 189–198. doi: 10.5604/1232406X.1122191.
25.
Łuczak J, Wolska A, Michalik J. Determinants of physical activity students of the College of Engineering and Health. Fizjoter Pol. 2019; 19(2): 158–167.
26.
Kościuczuk J, Krajewska-Kułak E, Okurowska-Zawada B. Aktywność fizyczna studentów fizjoterapii i dietetyki. Med Og Nauk Zdr. 2016; 22(1): 51–58. doi:
https://doi.org/10.5604/208345....
27.
Bergier B, Stępień E, Niźnikowska E, et al. Aktywność fizyczna kobiet i mężczyzn studiujących w Państwowej Szkole Wyższej w Białej Podlaskiej. Med Og Nauk Zdr. 2014; 20(2): 166–170. doi: 10.5604/20834543.1112232.
28.
Dugas L, Bovet P, Forrester T, et al. Comparisons of intensity-duration patterns of physical activity in the USA, Jamaica and 3 African countries. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14: 882. doi:
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471–2....
29.
Matei R, Ginsborg J. Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior, Anxiety, and Pain Among Musicians in the United Kingdom. Front Psychol. 2020; 11: 560026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.560026.