RESEARCH PAPER
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Poultry meat is one of the most consume meat worldwide. Customers perceive this kind of product as nutritious and convenient. Although it is considered healthy food, there are wide concerns regarding chemical and biological contaminants. Poultry meat is considered as the most important source of human campylobacteriosis, caused by Campylobacter spp. a dangerous foodborne pathogen. Moreover, the high content of protein and free amino acids in poultry meat predisposes this type of food to the occurrence of biogenic amines. In stored meat, the most prevalent diamines are putrescine and cadaverine that can be quality index for manufacture and hygiene practice.

Objective:
Taking into account that Campylobacter spp. is able to form putrescine in the metabolic pathway, the objective of the study was evaluation of the influence of Campylobacter spp. presence on putrescine quantity.

Material and methods:
Fifty-six samples of poultry meat were investigated by determining the presence of Campylobacter spp., according to the ISO Standard. In parallel, high performance liquid chromatography equipped with a UV/VIS DAD detector was performed.

Results:
The vast majority of samples (70%) were contaminated with Campylobacter spp. The pathogen prevalence ranged from 46.7% – 87.5%, for turkey and duck meat, respectively. Putrescine level varied from undetected values to 323.17 ± 0.05 mg kg−1. The highest putrescine concentration was noted in turkey meat.

Conclusions:
The results proved that fresh poultry meat is often contaminated with Campylobacter spp. and putrescine that decreases the quality, and constitutes public health hazard. However, putrescine concentrations were not affected by Campylobacter spp. occurrence. In order to ensure safety and protect from this kind of contamination, good hygiene practices at all stages of the poultry meat chain are essential.

 
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Wójcik W, Łukasiewicz-Mierzejewska M, Damaziak K, et al. Biogenic amines in poultry meat and poultry products: formation, appearance, and methods of reduction. Animals. 2022;12(12):1577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani121....
 
2.
Rouger A, Tresse O, Zagorec M. Bacterial contaminants of poultry meat: sources, species, and dynamics. Microorganisms. 2017;5(50):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/microo....
 
3.
Seman M, Gregova G, Korim P. Comparison of Campylobacter spp. and flock health indicators of broilers in Iceland. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2020;27(4):579–584. https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/....
 
4.
EFSA 2023. The European Union one health 2022 zoonoses report, EFSA J. 2023;21(12):8442. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa....
 
5.
Myintzaw P, Jaiswal AK, Jaiswal S. A review on campylobacteriosis associated with poultry meat consumption. Food Rev Inter. 2023;39(4):2107–2121. https://doi.org/10.1080/875591....
 
6.
Esposito L, Mastrocola D, Martuscelli M. Approaching to biogenic amines as quality markers in packaged chicken meat. Front Nutr. 2022;9:966790. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2....
 
7.
Feddern H, Mazzuco FN, Fonseca GJMM, et al. A review on biogenic amines in food and feed: Toxicological aspects, impact on health and control measures. Anim Prod Sci. 2019;59(4):608–618. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN1807....
 
8.
del Rio B, Fernandez M, Redruello B. New insights into the toxicological effects of dietary biogenic amines Food Chem. 2024;435:137558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.food....
 
9.
del Rio B, Redruello B, Linares D, et al. The biogenic amines putrescine and cadaverine show in vitro cytotoxicity at concentrations that can be found in foods. Sci Rep. 2019;9:120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iifo....
 
10.
Sivamaruthi BS, Kesika P, Chaiyasut C. Toxins in fermented foods: prevalence and preventions – a mini review. Toxins. 2019;11:4 https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins....
 
11.
Schirone M, Esposito L, D’Onofrio F, et al. Biogenic amines in meat and meat products: a review of the science and future perspectives. Foods. 2022;11(6):788. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods1....
 
12.
Hanfrey CC, Pearson BM, Hazeldine S, et al. Alternative spermidine biosynthetic route is critical for growth of Campylobacter jejuni and is the dominant polyamine pathway in human gut microbiota. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(50):43301–43312. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M1....
 
13.
Shek R, Dattmore DA, Stives DP, et al. Structural and functional basis for targeting Campylobacter jejuni agmatine deiminase to overcome antibiotic resistance. Biochem. 2017;56:6734–6742. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bi....
 
14.
PN-EN ISO 10272-1:2017-08/A1:2023-08 Food chain microbiology- Horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Campylobacter spp. Part 1: Detection method.
 
15.
Eerola S, Hinkkanen R, Lindfors E, et al. Liquid chromatography determination of biogenic amines in dry sausages. J AOAC Int. 1993;76:575–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iifo....
 
16.
Adzitey F, Rusul G, Huda N, et al. Prevalence, antibiotic resistance and RAPD typing of Campylobacter species isolated from ducks, their rearing and processing environments in Penang, Malaysia. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;154(3):197–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iifo....
 
17.
Tedersoo T, Roasto M, Mäesaar M, et al. The prevalence, counts, and MLST genotypes of Campylobacter in poultry meat and genomic comparison with clinical isolates. Poult Sci. 2022;101(4):101703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.....
 
18.
Bouhamed R, Bouayad L, Messad S, et al. Sources of contamination, prevalence, and antimicrobial resistance of thermophilic Campylobacter isolated from turkeys. Vet World. 2018;11(8):1074–1081. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.1074-1081.
 
19.
Wei B, Cha SY, Yoon RH, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolated from retail chicken and duck meat in South Korea. Food Control. 2016;62:63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.food....
 
20.
Luber P, Bartelt E. Enumeration of Campylobacter spp. on the surface and within chicken breast fillets. J Appl Microbiol. 2007;102:313–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
 
21.
Szosland-Fałtyn A, Bartodziejska B, Królasik J, Paziak-Domańska B, Korsak D, Chmiela M. The Prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in Polish poultry meat. Pol J Microbiol. 2018;9;67(1):117–120. doi:10.5604/01.3001.0011.6152.
 
22.
Jamali H, Ghaderpour A, Radmehr B, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter species isolates in ducks and geese. Food Control. 2015;50:328–330. http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/ep....
 
23.
Chmiel M, Roszko M, Hać-Szymańczuk E, et al. Changes in the microbiological quality and content of biogenic amines in chicken fillets packed using various techniques and stored under different conditions. Food Microbiol. 2022;102:103920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2....
 
24.
Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs as later amended.
 
25.
Balamatsia CC, Paleologos EK, Kontominas MG, et al. Correlation between microbial flora, sensory changes and biogenic amines formation in fresh chicken meat stored aerobically or under modified atmosphere packaging at 4 degrees C: possible role of biogenic amines as spoilage indicators. Anton Leeuw. 2006;89(1):9–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482....
 
26.
Fraqueza MJ, Alfaia CM, Barreto AS. Biogenic amine formation in turkey meat under modified atmosphere packaging with extended shelf life: Index of freshness. Poult Sci. 2012;91:1465–1472. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.201....
 
27.
Wójcik W, Damaziak K, Łukasiewicz-Mierzejewska M, et al. Correlation between biogenic amines and their precursors in stored chicken meat. Appl Sci. 2023;13(22):12230. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132....
 
28.
Gardini F, Özogul Y, Suzzi G, et al. Technological factors affecting biogenic amine content in foods: a review. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.....
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top