RESEARCH PAPER
Effects of subtalar arthroereisis in children, assessed on the basis of quality-of-life questionnaires
More details
Hide details
1
Clinical Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
2
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology of the Lokomotorl System for Children, Chorzów, Poland
Corresponding author
Kamila Pardus
Clinical Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2024;31(2):272-278
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
Subtalar arthroereisis is a procedure commonly performed in children with flat feet. The procedure is performed when conservative treatment did not have the desired effect,or when the patient’s abnormal symptoms are very severe and make it difficult for them to function normally in daily life. The aim of this study was to assess whether subtalar arthroereisis and physiotherapy improve the quality of life among children with flat feet.
Material and methods:
The study comprised 79 patients (140 operated feet) diagnosed with a flat foot defect who underwent a subtalar arthroereisis procedure. A self-administered questionnaire and a shortened version of the standardised WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire were used in the research.
Results:
The study confirmed that the patients’ quality of life after surgery was high in all the areas regarding the somatic, psychological, social and environmental domains. In the group of children assessed 13–24 months after surgery. it was also found that rapid fatigue after exercise (30% ± 9%) and Achilles tendon contracture (7% ± 4%) were significantly reduced. The results of the study confirmed that subtalar arthroereisis contributes to a decreased demand for orthoses in children (9% ± 6%) and for orthopaedic footwear (11% ± 5%) than before surgery.
Conclusions:
The employment of subtalars arthroereisis has a positive effect on the quality of life of children with flat feet. The surgery contributes to a reduction in pain and other abnormal symptoms that are associated with flat feet. In addition, physiotherapy performed after the procedure had a positive effect on the healing process and contributed to the improvement of the children’s quality of life.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors thank the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice for cooperation in the research based on an agreement for the implementation of scientific and research work by a young scientist (No. PCN-2–094/N/0/Z).
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Priyanka S, Murugan S. Anti Pronation Taping and Its Effect on Balance, Explosive Power and Agility of School Going Children with Flat Foot. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2020;11(7):934–939.
2.
Lynn SK, Padilla RA, Tsang KW. Differences in Static- and Dynamic-Balance Task Performance After 4 Weeks of Intrinsic-Foot-Muscle Training: The Short-Foot Exercise Versus the Towel-Curl Exercise. J Sport Rehabil. 2012;21(4):327–33.
3.
Leonchuk SS, Dyachkov K, Neretin AS, et al. Subtalar arthroereisis for treatment of children with flexible planovalgus foot deformity and analysis of CT data in long-term period. J Orthopaedics. 2020;22:478–484.
4.
Mazzotti A, Di Martino A, Geraci G, et al. Long-term results of subtalar arthroereisis for the treatment of symptomatic flexible flatfoot in children: an average fift een year follow-up study. Int Orthop. 2021;45:657–664.
5.
Paoloa C, Giadaa L, Lisaa B, et al. Functional evaluation of bilateral subtalar arthroereisis for the correction of flexible flatfoot in children: 1-year follow-up. Gait Posture. 2018;64:152–158.
6.
Carr II JB, Yang S, Lather LA. Pediatric Pes Planus: A Stateof-the-Art Review. Pediatrics. 2016;137(3):20151230.
7.
Landorf KB, Radford JA, Hudson S. Minimal Important Difference (MID) of two commonly used outcome measures for foot problems. J Foot Ankle Res. 2010;3:7.
8.
Balci P, Nohutlu ÖE, Bek N, et al. Does flexible taping effect contact area, time and total loading of foot in children with flatfoot? Develop Med Child Neurol. 2014;56:4.
9.
Walkowska K, Siwiec S. Ćwiczenia krótkiej stopy (SFE) jako forma przeciwdziałania płaskostopiu u dzieci. In: Borowicz AM, Osińska M. Horyzonty współczesnej fizjoterapii. Poznań: Wyd. Wyższej Szkoły Edukacji i Terapii; 2016. p. 89–99.
10.
Kuliński W, Zeman K. Fizjoterapia w pediatrii. Warszawa: Wyd. PZWL; 2014.
11.
Jaracz K, Kalfoss M, Górna K, Bączyk G. Quality of life in Polish respondents: psychometric properties of the Polish WHOQOL – Bref. Scand J Caring Sci. 2006;20:251–260.
12.
Kłosiński M, Tomaszewski KA, Tomaszewska IM, et al. Validation of the Polish language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in patients suffering from lumbar spinal stenosis. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2014;21(4):866–870.
13.
Megremis P, Megremis O. Arthroereisis for Symptomatic Flexible Flatfoot Deformity in Young Children: Radiological Assessment and Short-Term Follow-Up. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;58:904-915.
14.
Elmarghanya M, El-Ghaffara TMA, Elgeushya A, et al. Is subtalar extra articular screw arthroereisis (SESA) reducing pain and restoring medial longitudinal arch in children with flexible flat foot? J Orthopaedics. 2020;20:147–153.
15.
Ruiz-Picazo D, Jiménez-Ortega P, Donate-Pérez F, et al. Radiographic and Functional Results following Subtalar Arthroereisis in Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot. Adv Orthopedics. 2019;5061934.
16.
Martinelli N, Bianchi A, Martinkevich P, et al. Return to sport activities after subtalar arthroereisis for correction of pediatric flexible flatfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018;27:1.
17.
Li B, He W, Yu G, et al. Treatment for Flexible Flatfoot in Children With Subtalar Arthroereisis and Soft Tissue Procedures. Front Pediatr. 2021;9:656178.
18.
Tahririan MA, Ramtin S, Taheri P. Functional and radiographic comparison of subtalar arthroereisis and lateral calcaneal lengthening in the surgical treatment of flexible flatfoot in children. Int Orthop. 2021;45:2291–2298.
19.
Boszczyk A, Błoński M, Pomianowski S. Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Polish Version of Foot and Ankle Outcomes Questionnaire. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2015;2(6):175–187.
20.
Di Gennaro GL, Stallone S, Olivotto E, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment in children with painful rigid flatfoot and talocalcaneal coalition. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21:185.
21.
Wang S, Chen L, Yu J, et al. Mid-term Results of Subtalar Arthroereisis with Talar-Fit Implant in Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot and Identifying the Effects of Adjunctive Procedures and Risk Factors for Sinus Tarsi Pain. Orthop Surg. 2021;13:175–184.
22.
Bernasconia A, Iervolino C, D’Alterio R, et al. Midterm assessment of subtalar arthroereisis for correction of flexible flatfeet in children. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106:185–191.
23.
Vogt B, Toporowski G, Gosheger G, et al. Subtalar Arthroereisis for Flexible Flatfoot in Children – Clinical, Radiographic andPedobarographic Outcome Comparing Three Different Methods. Children. 2021;8:359.
24.
Braito M, Radlwimmer M, Dammerer D, et al. Tarsometatarsal bone remodelling after subtalar arthroereisis. J Children’s Orthopeadics. 2020;14:221–229.
25.
Sterian AG, Ulici A. Quality of Life after Flatfoot Surgery in the Pediatric Population. J Med Life. 2020;13:356–361.
26.
Hagen L, Kostakev M, Pape JP, Peterlein CD. Are there benefits of a 2D gait analysis in the evaluation of the subtalar extra-articular screw arthroereisis? Short-term investigation in children. Clin Biomechanics. 2019;63:73–78.
27.
Hong J, Dai G, Weng Q, Liu Y. Interference Screw for the Treatment of Pediatric Flexible Flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;59:1209-1214.
28.
Arbab D, Frank D, Bouillon B, et al. Subtalare Screw Arthroereisis for the Treatment of Symptomatic, Flexible Pes Planovalgus. Orthop Unfall. 2018;156(01):93–99.
29.
Cao L, Miao X, Wu Y, et al. Therapeutic Outcomes of Kalix II in Treating Juvenile Flexible Flatfoot. Orthop Surg. 2017;9:20–27.
30.
Faldini C, Mazzotti A, Panciera A, et al. Patient-perceived outcomes after subtalar arthroereisis with bioabsorbable implants for flexible flatfoot in growing age: a 4-year follow-up study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28:707–712.
31.
Hagen L, Pape JP, Kostakev M, Peterlein CD. Pedobarographic changes during first month after subtalar extra-articular screw arthroereisis (SESA) operation of juvenile flexible flatfoot. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140:313–320.
32.
Das SP, Das PB, Ganesh S, Sahu MC. Effectiveness of surgically treated symptomatic plano-valgus deformity by the calcaneo stop procedure according to radiological, functional and gait parameters. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2017;12(2):102–109.
33.
Indino C, Villafane JH, D’Ambrosi R, et al. Effectiveness of subtalar arthroereisis with endorthesis for pediatric flexible flat foot: a retrospective cross-sectional study with final follow up at skeletal maturity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2020;26:98–104.
34.
Giannini S, Cadossi M,, Mazzotti A, et al. Bioabsorbable Calcaneo-Stop Implant for the Treatment of Flexible Flatfoot: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Minimum Follow-Up of 4 Years. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56:776–782.
35.
Kubo H, Lipp C, Hufeland M, et al. Outcome after subtalar screw arthroereisis in children with flexible flatfoot depends on time of treatment: Midterm results of 95 cases. J Orthop Sci. 2020;25:497–502.