REVIEW PAPER
Does functional assessment of individuals aged 80-plus give rise to scientific discussion – considerations based on literature review
 
More details
Hide details
1
Laboratory of Clinical Skills and Medical Simulation, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
 
2
Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Chair of Social Medicine, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin Poland
 
3
Department of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nursing, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
 
 
Corresponding author
Paulina Zabielska   

Chair and Department of Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Żołnierska, 48, 71-210 Szczecin, Poland
 
 
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2019;26(2):375-378
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and objective:
For many years, Europe has been struggling with the problem of an aging society. It is obvious that everyone would like to live longer while retaining good psycho-physical health and social activity. This, however, is influenced by many factors, such as health, which may be a form of limitation in everyday life or in performing social roles in accordance with the norms.

Objective:
The aim of the study was to analyze the use of scales for functional assessment of basic and complex daily living activities in individuals aged 80+ in various EU countries.

Materials and method:
Potentially essential articles were obtained through review and analysis of the PUBMED (MEDLINE) database by entering the following keywords: functional activities of daily living, ADL, IADL, complex activities of daily living, basic activities of daily living. Article selection was based on the following inclusion criteria set by the authors and the appointed Advisory Board.

Results:
Assessment of independence and fitness of elderly persons in the area of basic and complex activities of daily living provides information on the quality of life of senior individuals. Analysis of research data used for comparing functional independence of senior persons on the basis of ADL and IADL scales is difficult due to the discrepancies, which may be confusing for researchers studying this area.

Conclusions:
The use of different methodologies for assessing functional fitness of elderly individuals makes it difficult to interpret, compare and practically apply the outcomes. Standardization of research methods used for assessment of basic and complex daily living activities in 80+ persons would enable comparing the obtained data in an interdisciplinary perspective.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors express their thanks to the Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin, Poland, for providing funds for the performance of this systematic review.
 
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Portret generacji 50+ w Polsce i w Europie. Wyniki badania zdrowia, starzenia się i przechodzenia na emeryturę w Europie (SHARE) [Portrait of 50+ generation in Poland and in Europe. Results of health, aging and retirement in Europe (SHARE)]. Warszawa: Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych; 2014.
 
2.
ec.europa.eu [homepage on the Internet] Policy – European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/health/po... (access: 2017.06.02).
 
3.
Prognoza ludności Unii Europejskiej 2008–2060 [Forecast of the population of the European Union 2008–2060]. EUROSTAT 2008.
 
4.
Cybulski M, Cybulski Ł, Krajewska-Kułak E, et al. Ocena opieki geriatrycznej przez osoby w podeszłym wieku w wybranych krajach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej [Assessment of geriatric care by the elderly in selected Central and Eastern European countries]. Gerontol Pol. 2016; 24: 269–277.
 
5.
Żołędowski C. Starzenie się ludności – Polska na tle Unii Europejskiej [Aging population – Poland against the background of the European Union]. Problemy Polityki Społecznej. Studia i Dyskusje. 2012; 17: 29–43.
 
6.
ec.europa.eu [homepage on the Internet] Statystyki dotyczące ludności na poziomie regionalnym [Regional population statistics]. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/s... (access: 2017.06.11).
 
7.
Zaidi A. Features and challenges of population ageing: the European perspective. Vienna. European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research. 2008 [cited 2017 Jun 14]; 49. http://www.euro.centre.org/dat....
 
8.
Plaszewska-Żywko L, Brzuzan P, Malinowska-Lipień I, et al. Sprawność funkcjonalna u osób w wieku podeszłym w domach pomocy społecznej [Functional efficiency in the elderly in social welfare homes]. Probl Hig Epidemiol. 2008; 89(1): 62–66.
 
9.
Szarota Z. Gerontologia społeczna i oświatowa [Social and educational Gerontology]. Kraków: Wyd. Naukowe Akademii Pedagogicznej; 2004.
 
10.
Wizner B, Skalska A, Klich-Rączka A, Piotrowicz K, Grodzicki T. Ocena stanu funkcjonalnego u osób w starszym wieku [Assessment of functional status in elderly] [w:] Aspekty medyczne, psychologiczne, socjologiczne i ekonomiczne starzenia się ludzi w Polsce [Medical, psychological, sociological and economic aspects of aging in Poland] (red.) Mossakowska M, Więcek A, Błędowski P. Poznań: Termedia; 2012.
 
11.
Graf C. The Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale. Am J Nurs. 2008; 108(4): 52–62.
 
12.
Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist. 1969; 9(3): 179–86.
 
13.
Michałkiewicz H, Wróbel J. Całościowa ocena geriatryczna – narzędzie ważne również dla fizjoterapeutów [Global geriatric assessment – a tool important for physiotherapists as well]. Zamojskie Studia i Materiały 2012; 1(35): 91–96.
 
14.
Jachimowicz V, Kostka T. Ocena poczucia własnej skuteczności u pensjonariuszy Domu Pomocy Społecznej [Evaluation of self-efficacy in the residents of the Social Welfare Home]. Gerontol Pol. 2009; 17(1): 23–31.
 
15.
Kozak-Szkopek E, Galus K. Wpływ rehabilitacji ruchowej na sprawność psychofizyczną osób w podeszłym wieku [Impact of physical rehabilitation on psychophysical fitness of the elderly]. Gerontol Pol. 2009; 17(2): 79–84.
 
16.
Mossakowska M, Broczek K, Wieczorowska-Tobis K, et al. Cognitive Performance and Functional Status Are the Major Factors Predicting Survival of Centenarians in Poland. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014; 69(10): 1269–1275.
 
17.
Biercewicz M, Kędziora-Kornatowska K. Częstotliwość występowania chorób układu nerwowego w populacji osób powyżej 65 roku życia [The Incidence Rate of Nervous System Disorders in Patients Above the Age of 65]. JNNN. 2015; 4(3): 96–101.
 
18.
Puzio G, Stopa A, Szczygielska–Babiuch A, et al. Ocena podstawowych i złożonych czynności życia codziennego pacjentów geriatrycznych po zabiegu endoprotezoplastyki stawu biodrowego [Evaluation of basic and complex activities of everyday life of geriatric patients after hip replacement surgery]. Postępy Rehabil. 2014; 4: 13–20.
 
19.
Skubiszewska A, Wodzyńska K, Szybalska A, et al. Ocena sprawności funkcjonalnej warszawskich stulatków w zakresie podstawowych czynności życia codziennego – wyniki wstępne [Evaluation of functional skills of Warsaw centenarians in basic everyday activities – preliminary results]. Gerontol Pol. 2014; 3: 151–155.
 
20.
Staszczak-Gawełda I, Szczygielska-Babiuch A, Puzio G, et al. Ocena sprawności funkcjonalnej osób starszych z lekkim otępieniem [Functional assessment of elderly patients with mild dementia]. Gerontol Pol. 2013; 4: 127–132.
 
21.
Kingston A, Collerton J, Davies K, et al. Losing the Ability in Activities of Daily Living in theOldest Old: A Hierarchic Disability Scale from the Newcastle 85+ Study. PLoS One. 2012; 7(2): e31665.
 
22.
Drewes YM, Den Elzen WPJ, Mooijaart SP, et al. The effect of cognitive impairment on thepredictive value of multimorbidity forthe increase in disability in the oldest old:the Leiden 85-plus Study. Age Ageing 2011; 40: 352–357.
 
23.
Enkvista A, Ekström H, Elmståhl S. Associations between functional ability and life satisfaction in the oldest old: results from the longitudinal population study Good Aging in Skåne. Clin Interv Aging. 2012; 7: 313–320.
 
eISSN:1898-2263
ISSN:1232-1966
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top