Online first
Current issue
Archive
Special Issues
About the Journal
Publication Ethics
Anti-Plagiarism system
Instructions for Authors
Instructions for Reviewers
Editorial Board
Editorial Office
Contact
Reviewers
All Reviewers
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
General Data Protection Regulation (RODO)
RESEARCH PAPER
Does body posture during tree felling influence the physiological load of a chainsaw operator?
1
Poznań University of Life Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, Poland
Corresponding author
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2017;24(3):401-405
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction and Objectives:
Holding determined body postures during work is connected with muscles activity. The more forced the posture, the larger the number of muscles taking an active part in holding and stabilizing the work posture. During logging, the greatest share of awkward (forced) working postures occurs in tree felling by chainsaw.
Material and Methods:
A group of 10 experienced fellers aged 47.5±7.3 (37 – 59-years-old) was studied. Heart rate (HR) was measured during simulation of felling activity in 4 working postures: back bent forward with straight legs (stoop), back bent forward with bent legs (flexed-stoop), squat and kneeling on one knee (half-kneel).
Results:
The lowest value of HR was noticed for squatting – 114.1 bpm, then for kneeling on one knee – 116.3 bpm. HR during felling in a standing posture with straight legs amounted to 121.5 bpm and for standing with bent legs 125.3 bpm. For all studied postures the differences in average HR values were statistically significant at p<0.01.
Conclusions:
A working posture during tree felling by chainsaw has influence on the level of physiological workload of an operator. Standing bent forward body postures cause higher heart response than squatting and half-kneeling.
Holding determined body postures during work is connected with muscles activity. The more forced the posture, the larger the number of muscles taking an active part in holding and stabilizing the work posture. During logging, the greatest share of awkward (forced) working postures occurs in tree felling by chainsaw.
Material and Methods:
A group of 10 experienced fellers aged 47.5±7.3 (37 – 59-years-old) was studied. Heart rate (HR) was measured during simulation of felling activity in 4 working postures: back bent forward with straight legs (stoop), back bent forward with bent legs (flexed-stoop), squat and kneeling on one knee (half-kneel).
Results:
The lowest value of HR was noticed for squatting – 114.1 bpm, then for kneeling on one knee – 116.3 bpm. HR during felling in a standing posture with straight legs amounted to 121.5 bpm and for standing with bent legs 125.3 bpm. For all studied postures the differences in average HR values were statistically significant at p<0.01.
Conclusions:
A working posture during tree felling by chainsaw has influence on the level of physiological workload of an operator. Standing bent forward body postures cause higher heart response than squatting and half-kneeling.
REFERENCES (31)
2.
Åstrand P-O, Rodahl K, Dahl HA, Strømme SB. Textbook of work physiology: Physiological bases of exercise. 4th ed. Human Kinetics, Champaign (IL), 2003.
3.
Leszczyński K. The concentration of carbon monoxide in the breathing areas of workers during logging operations at the motor-manual level. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2014; 27: 821–829.
4.
Grzywiński W. Influence of working posture during the felling on energy expenditure of a chainsaw operator. Sylwan. 2015, 159: 824–830 (in Polish with English summary).
5.
Kukkonen-Harjula K, Rauramaa R. Oxygen consumption of lumberjacks in logging with a power-saw. Ergonomics. 1984; 27: 59–65.
6.
Hagen KB, Vik T, Myhr NE, Opsahl PA, Harms-Ringdahl K. Physical workload, perceived exertion, and output of cut wood as related to age in motor-manual cutting. Ergonomics. 1993; 36: 479–488.
7.
Apud E, Valdes S. Ergonomics in forestry. The Chilean case. Geneva: International Labour Organization, 1995.
8.
Christie CJ-A. A field investigation of physical workloads imposed on harvesters in South African forestry. Ph.D. Dissertation. Rhodes University, Grahamstown, 2006.
9.
Çalişkan E, Çağlar S. An assessment of physiological workload of forest workers in felling operations. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010; 9: 5651–5658.
10.
Harstela P. Work postures and strain of workers in nordic forest work: A selective review. Int J Ind Ergon. 1990; 5: 219–226.
11.
Grzywiński W. The effect of selected factors on the type of working postures of chainsaw operator during felling. Wyd. UP w Poznaniu, Poznań, 2011 (in Polish with English summary).
12.
Sawastian K, Grzywiński W, Turowski R. Analysis of postural strain of loggers during timber harvesting in a spruce stand. For Lett. 2015; 108: 1–6.
13.
ILO. Occupational safety and health in forestry. Forestry and Wood Industries Committee. 2nd Session. Report III. ILO, Geneva, 1991.
14.
Hagen KB, Magnus P, Vetlesen K. Neck/shoulder and low-back disorders in the forestry industry: Relationship to work tasks and perceived psychosocial job stress. Ergonomics. 1998; 41: 1510–1518.
15.
Ashby L, Bentley T, Parker R. Musculoskeletal disorders in silviculture and logging 1995–1999. COHFE Rep. 2001; 2, 3: 1–8.
16.
Gallis C. Work-related prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among Greek forest workers. Int J Ind Ergon. 2006; 36: 731–736.
17.
Grzywiński W, Wandycz A, Tomczak A, Jelonek T. The prevalence of self-reported musculoskeletal symptoms among loggers in Poland. Int J Ind Ergon. 2016; 52: 12–17.
18.
Steponavičius D, Zinkevičius R. The study of the logging methods prevailed in Lithuania and other countries of Central Europe. EJPAU. 2010; 13, 1: 1–6.
19.
Parker R, Sullman M, Kirk P, Ford D. Chainsaw size for delimbing. Ergonomics. 1999; 42: 897–903.
20.
Forestry 2015. Central Statistical Office, Warszawa. http://stat.gov.pl/files/gfx/p... (access: 2016.05.08).
22.
Pheasant S. Bodyspace – Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the design of work. 2nd edition. Taylor & Francis, London, 1996.
23.
Vos HW. Physical workload in different body postures, while working near to, or below ground level. Ergonomics. 1973; 16: 817–828.
24.
Leszczyński K, Stańczykiewicz A. Workload analysis in logging technology employing a processor aggregated with a farm tractor. Forest Syst. 2015; 24, 2: 1–8.
25.
Ottaviani Aalmo G, Magagnotti N, Spinelli R. Forest workers and steep terrain winching: The impact of environmental and anthropometric parameters on performance. Croat J For Eng. 2016; 37: 97–105.
26.
Malchaire J, Cock N, Vergracht S. Review of the factors associated with musculoskeletal problems in epidemiological studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2001; 74: 79–90.
27.
Vieira ER, Kumar S. Working postures: A literature review. J Occup Rehabil. 2004; 14: 143–159.
28.
Norman R, Wells R. Ergonomic interventions for reducing musculoskeletal disorders: An overview, related issues and future directions. University of Waterloo, Waterloo, 1998.
29.
Tirtayasa K, Adiputra IN, Djestawana IG. The change of working posture in manggur decreases cardiovascular load and musculoskeletal complaints among Balinese gamelan craftsmen. J Hum Ergol. 2003; 32: 71–76.
30.
Driessen MT, Proper KI, Anema JR, Knol DL, Bongers PM, van der Beek AJ. The effectiveness of participatory ergonomics to prevent low-back and neck pain – results of a cluster randomized controlled trial. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011; 37: 383–393.
31.
Wayan Surata I, Manuaba A, Adiputra N, Sutjana DP. Changing body posture and working system improves workers performance and product quality. Indonesian J Biomed Sci. 2011; 5: 1–14.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1898-2263 |
| ISSN: | 1232-1966 |
Improvement of visual identification of the journal - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
