Online first
Current issue
Archive
Special Issues
About the Journal
Publication Ethics
Anti-Plagiarism system
Instructions for Authors
Instructions for Reviewers
Editorial Board
Editorial Office
Contact
Reviewers
All Reviewers
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
General Data Protection Regulation (RODO)
RESEARCH PAPER
Continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring (CIONM) of the recurrent laryngeal nerve is sufficient as the only neuromonitoring technique in thyroidectomy performed because of benign goitre
1
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Medical University, Łódź, Poland
2
Department of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital/Research Institute, Łódź, Poland
3
Department of Oncological Endocrinology and Nuclear Medicine, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015;22(3):495-498
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Recently, intraoperative neurophysiological neuromonitoring (IONM) of recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLN) has been evolving quickly. This evolution touched many aspects of the technique, leading to continuous stimulation of the RLN with real time analysis of the electrical signal.
Objective:
The aim of the study was to estimate the value of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring (CIONM) as the only technique for intraoperative neuromonitoring in thyroidectomy performed because of benign goitre.
Material and Methods:
The study comprised 80 women qualified for thyroidectomy due to nodular goitre. The patients were divided into 4 groups depending on the technique used for RLN integrity verification: group 1 – thyroidectomy with CIONM; group 2 – thyroidectomy with direct, intermittent stimulation of RLN and vagus nerve (NX); group 3 – both CIONM and intermittent stimulation of RLN and NX; group 4 – thyroidectomy without any IONM.
Results:
Mean operation time did not differ significantly among the groups with IONM, but was significantly longer in comparison to group 4, as well as the operation’s cost. In the analysed groups there was no significant difference in complication ratio.
Conclusions:
CIONM with RLN visualization in thyroidectomy performed because of benign goitre is as safe as other methods of IONM and gives a continuous confirmation of the electrical integrity of the loop NX-RLN-vocal folds during almost the entire procedure. There is a clinical need for the development of external stimulation of NX (transdermal or trancranial), particularly for minimally invasive techniques in which access to NX is limited (i.e. transoral thyroidectomy).
Recently, intraoperative neurophysiological neuromonitoring (IONM) of recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLN) has been evolving quickly. This evolution touched many aspects of the technique, leading to continuous stimulation of the RLN with real time analysis of the electrical signal.
Objective:
The aim of the study was to estimate the value of continuous intraoperative neuromonitoring (CIONM) as the only technique for intraoperative neuromonitoring in thyroidectomy performed because of benign goitre.
Material and Methods:
The study comprised 80 women qualified for thyroidectomy due to nodular goitre. The patients were divided into 4 groups depending on the technique used for RLN integrity verification: group 1 – thyroidectomy with CIONM; group 2 – thyroidectomy with direct, intermittent stimulation of RLN and vagus nerve (NX); group 3 – both CIONM and intermittent stimulation of RLN and NX; group 4 – thyroidectomy without any IONM.
Results:
Mean operation time did not differ significantly among the groups with IONM, but was significantly longer in comparison to group 4, as well as the operation’s cost. In the analysed groups there was no significant difference in complication ratio.
Conclusions:
CIONM with RLN visualization in thyroidectomy performed because of benign goitre is as safe as other methods of IONM and gives a continuous confirmation of the electrical integrity of the loop NX-RLN-vocal folds during almost the entire procedure. There is a clinical need for the development of external stimulation of NX (transdermal or trancranial), particularly for minimally invasive techniques in which access to NX is limited (i.e. transoral thyroidectomy).
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Richmon JD, Holsinger FC, Kandil E, Moore MW, Garcia JA, Tufano RP. Transoral robotic-assisted thyroidectomy with central neck dissection: preclinical cadaver feasibility study and proposed surgical technique. J Robot Surg. 2011; 5(4): 279–282.
2.
Cernea CR, Ferraz AR, Nishio S, Dutra A Jr, Hojaij FC, dos Santos LR. Surgical anatomy of the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve. Head & Neck. 1992; 14(5): 380–383.
3.
Lahey FH; Hoover WB. Injuries to the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid operations: their management and avoidance. Ann Surg. 1938; 108(4): 545–562.
4.
Shedd DP, Burget GC. Identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Arch Surg. 1966; 92(6): 861–864.
5.
Echeverri A, Flexon PB. Electrophysiologic nerve stimulation for identifying the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery: review of 70 consecutive thyroid surgeries. Am Surg. 1998; 64(4): 328–333.
6.
Scheuller MC, Ellison D. Laryngeal mask anesthesia with intraoperative laryngoscopy for identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve during thyroidectomy. Laryngoscope. 2002; 112(9): 1594–1597.
7.
Lipton RJ, McCaffrey TV, Litchy WJ. Intraoperative electrophysiologic monitoring of laryngeal muscle during thyroid surgery. Laryngoscope. 1988; 98: 1292–1296.
8.
Barwell J, Lytle J, Page R, Wilkins D. The NIM-2 nerve integrity monitoring thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Br J Surg 1997; 84(6): 854.
9.
Horn D, Rotzscher VM. Intraoperative electromyogram monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: experience with an intralaryngeal surface electrode. A method to reduce the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroid surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1999; 384(4): 392–395.
10.
Lamadé W, Meyding-Lamadé U, Hund E, Senninger N, Herfarth C. Transtracheal monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Prototype of new tube. Chirurg. 1997; 68(2): 193–195.
11.
Lamadé W, Meyding-Lamadé U, Buchhold C, Brauer M, Brandner R, Uttenweiler V, Motsch J, Klar E, Herfarth C. First continuous nerve monitoring in thyroid gland surgery. Chirurg. 2000; 71(5): 551–557.
12.
Randolph GW, Dralle H, with the International Intraoperative Monitoring Study Group: Abdullah H, Barczynski M, Bellantone R, Brauckhoff M, Carnaille B, Cherenko S, Chiang FY, Dionigi G, Finck C, Hartl D, Kamani D, Lorenz K, Miccolli P, Mihai R, Miyauchi A, Orloff L, Perrier N, Poveda MD, Romanchishen A, Serpell J, Sitges-Serra A, Sloan T, Van Slycke S, Snyder S, Takami H, Volpi E, Woodson G. Electrophysiologic Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring During Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: International Standards Guideline Statement. Laryngoscope. 2011; 121(suppl 1): S1–S16.
13.
Wu CW, Dionigi G, Chen HC, Chen HY, Lee KW, Lu IC, Chang PY, Hsiao PJ, Ho KY, Chiang FY. Vagal nerve stimulation without dissecting the carotid sheath during intraoperative neuromonitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery. Head Neck 2013; 35(10): 1443–1447. doi: 10.1002/hed.23154.
14.
Schneider R, Przybyl J, Pliquett U, Hermann M, Wehner M, Pietsch UC, König F, Hauss J, Jonas S, Leinung S. A new vagal anchor electrode for real-time monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Am J Surg. 2010; 199(4): 507–514.
15.
Friedrich C, Ulmer C, Rieber F, Kern E, Kohler A, Schymik K, Thon KP, Lamadé W. Safety analysis of vagal nerve stimulation for continuous nerve monitoring during thyroid surgery. Laryngoscope. 2012, 122(9): 1979–1987.
16.
Dedecjus M, Adamczewski Z, Brzeziński J, Lewiński A. Real-time, high-resolution ultrasonography of the vocal folds--a prospective pilot study in patients before and after thyroidectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010, 395(7): 859–864.
17.
Dralle H, Sekulla C, Haerting J, Timmermann W, Neumann HJ, Kruse E, Grond S, Mühlig HP, Richter C, Voss J, Thomusch O, Lippert H, Gastinger I, Brauckhoff M, Gimm O. Risk factors of paralysis and functional outcome after recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring in thyroid surgery. Surgery. 2004; 136(6): 1310–1322.
18.
Ready AR and Barnes AD. Complications of thyroidectomy. Br J Surg. 1994; 81(11): 1555–1556.
19.
Dralle H, Sekulla C, Lorenz K, Brauckhoff M, Machens A. German IONM Study Group: Intraoperative monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery. World J Surg. 2008; 32(7): 1358–1366.
20.
Barczyński M, Konturek A, Cichoń S. Randomized clinical trial of visualization versus neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerves during thyroidectomy. Br J Surg. 2009; 96(3): 240–246.
21.
Silva IC, Netto Ide P, Vartanian JG, Kowalski LP, Carrara-de Angelis E. Prevalence of upper aerodigestive symptoms in patients who underwent thyroidectomy with and without the use of intraoperative laryngeal nerve monitoring. Thyroid. 2012; 22(8): 814–819.
22.
Snyder SK, Lairmore TC, Hendricks JC, Roberts JW. Elucidating mechanisms of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 206(1): 123–130.
23.
Thomusch O, Sekulla C, Machens A, Neumann HJ, Timmermann W, Dralle H. Validity of intraoperative neuromonitoring signals in thyroid surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2004(6); 389: 499–503.
24.
Dionigi G, Bacuzzi A, Boni L, Rausei S, Rovera F, Dionigi R. Visualization versus neuromonitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerves during thyroidectomy: what about the costs? World J Surg. 2012; 36(4): 748–54.
25.
Dionigi G, Alesina PF, Barczynski M, Boni L, Chiang FY, Kim HY, Materazzi G, Randolph GW, Terris DJ, Wu CW. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in video-assisted thyroidectomy: lessons learned from neuromonitoring. Surg Endosc. 2012 26(9): 2601–2608.
| eISSN: | 1898-2263 |
| ISSN: | 1232-1966 |
Improvement of visual identification of the journal - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher Education allocated to the activities of disseminating science.
Generation of the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) - task financed under the agreement No. 618/P-DUN/2019 by the Minister of Science and Higher
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
