RESEARCH PAPER
Assessment of microbiological cleanness of selected medicinal herbs in relations to the level of resource fragmentation
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Allergology and Environmental Hazards, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Food Engineering and Machines, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Mother and Child Health, Poznan University of Medical Science, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013;20(4):812-815
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Herbs are commonly used in the food and pharmaceutical industries. Their vast use is connected with their antibacterial or antioxidising properties, as well as numerous pro-health properties. The aim of the presented research was assessment of the quantitative and qualitative composition of moulds which contaminate samples of dried herbs: Sage (Salvia officinalis L.), Camomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.) and Melissa (Mellisa officinalis L.) with different degrees of resource fragmentation. The dried herbs investigated had a characteristic mould content below 1•106 CFU/g according to the recommendations of the European Herbal Infusions Association (EHIA). The most contaminated resource turned out to be Camomile, the least – Melissa. The most often isolated moulds were: Aspergillus, Penicillium, Ulocladium, Alternaria. Moreover, it was observed that more fragmented dried herbs were characteristic of lower – by approx. 40–55% microbiological contamination -depending on the type of tested herb, which might be connected with the time of dried herbs’ processing, higher aeration, moisture changes or mechanical damaging of fungi’s fragments in the case of a resource with higher fragmentation. High contamination of a herbal resource might be harmful for a consumer, and moulds and their metabolites in the form of mitotoxins might constitute a threat for human health. To keep all the sensory features and activity of herbs’ active substances, it is extremely important to secure their high microbiological quality.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Remiszewski M, Kulczak M, Jeżewska M, Korbas E, Czajkowska D. Wpływ procesu dekontaminacji z zastosowaniem pary wodnej na jakość wybranych przypraw. Żywność. Nauka. Technologia. Jakość, 2006; 3(48): 23–34.
2.
Dang MN, Takácsová M,Nguyen DV, Kristiánová K. Antioxidant activity of essential oils from various spices. Nahrung/Food. 2001; 45(1): 64–66.
3.
Burt S. Essential oils: their antibacterial properties and potential applications in foods – a review. International J. Food Microbiol. 2004; 94: 223–253.
4.
Seidler-Łożyskowska K, Golcz A, Wójcik J. Yield and quality of sweet basil, savory, marjoram and thyme raw materials from organic cultivation on the composted manure. J Res Appl Agric Engineer. 2008; 53(4): 63–66.
5.
Bugno A, Almodovar A, Pereira T, Pinto T, Sabino M. Occurrence of toxigenic fungi in herbal drugs. Brazilian J Microbiol. 2006; 37: 47–51.
6.
Janda-Ulfig K, Ulfig K. Susze ziołowe i przyprawy jako źródło miko -toksyn. Przem Spoż. 2008; 3: 36–38.
7.
Doyle MP, Erickson MC. Summer meeting 2007 – the problems with fresh produce: an overview. J Appl Microbiol. 2008; 105: 317–330.
8.
Kędzia B. Drogi zanieczyszczenia surowców zielarskich drobnoustro-jami. Herba Pol. 2002; 1: 35–51.
9.
Wójcik-Stopczyńska B, Jakubowska B, Reichelt M. Microbiological contamination of dried culinary herbs. Herba Pol. 2009; 55(3): 206–213.
10.
Sagoo SK, Little CL, Greenwood M, Mithani V, Grant KA, McLauchlin J, de Pinna E, Threlfall EJ. Assessment of the microbiological safety of dried spices and herbs from production and retail premises in the United Kingdom. Food Microbiol. 2009; 26: 39–43.
11.
Samson RA, Hoekstra ES, Frisvad JC, Filtenborg O. Introduction to food and airborne fungi. 6 th ed. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, 2002.
12.
Krzyściak P, Skóra M, Macura AB. Atlas grzybów chorobotwórczych człowieka. 1 st ed. MedPharm Polska, Wrocław, 2011.
13.
Larone DH. Medically Important Fungi – a guide to identification. 5 th ed. ASM Press, Washington, 2011.
14.
Ramirez C. Manual and atlas of the Penicillia. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, 1982.
15.
PN-ISO 7954:1999. Mikrobiologia. Ogólne zasady oznaczania drożdży i pleśni. Metoda płytkowa w 25 °C.
16.
European Herbal Infusions Association. Guidelines for good agricultural and hygiene practices for raw materials used for herbal and fruit infusions (GAHP). EHIA, Hamburg, 2012.
17.
Kabelitz L. Sposoby korygowania wad jakościowych surowców roślinnych. Wiad Ziel. 2002; 2: 13–16.
18.
Steinka I, Misiewicz Ł, Kukułowicz A, Ćwikliński M, Dmowski P, Sznajdrowska A. Próba oceny jakości mikrobiologicznej wybranych suszy roślinnych stosowanych jako używki i preparaty o znaczeniu leczniczym. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Morskiej W Gdyni, 2011; 68: 13–20.
19.
Dutkiewicz J, Krysińska-Traczyk E, Skórska C, Sitkowska J, Prażmo Z, Golec M. Exposure to airborne microorganisms and endotoxin in herb processing plants. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2001; 8: 201–211.
20.
Gniadek A, Skóra M, Garlicki A, Gądek A, Macura AB. Prevalence of dermatophytes in interdigital spaces in HIV patients. Post Dermatol Alergol. 2012; XXIX, 1: 30–34.
21.
Markowska J, Libudzisz Z. Stan mikrobiologiczny surowców ziołowych w Polsce, III Konferencja Naukowa „Rozkład i korozja mikrobiologiczna materiałów technicznych”, Łódź 2003: 306–309.
22.
Mandeel QA. Fungal contamination of some imported spices. Mycopathologia 2005; 159: 291–298.
23.
Gurtarowska B, Jotkowska A. Porównanie dwóch metod oceny zanieczyszczenia grzybami strzępkowymi ziół i przypraw ziołowych, III Konferencja Naukowa „Rozkład i korozja mikrobio-logiczna materiałów technicznych”, Łódź 2003: 314–317.
24.
Żukiewicz-Sobczak W. The role of fungi in allergic diseases. Postep Derm Alergol. 2013; 30(1): 42–45.
25.
Dutkiewicz J, Górny RL. Biological factors hazardous to human health: classification and criteria of exposure assessment. Med Pr. 2002; 53(1): 29–39.
26.
Żukiewicz-Sobczak W, Cholewa G, Krasowska E, Zwoliński J, Sobczak P, Zawiślak K, Chmielewska-Badora J, Piątek J, Wojtyła A. Pathogenic fungi in the work environment of organic and conventional farmers. Postep Derm Alergol. 2012; 29(4): 256–262.