RESEARCH PAPER
Comparison of selected sperm parameters between 6,278 males in Poland and Ukraine
More details
Hide details
1
Diagnostic Techniques Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
2
Medical Center “Intersono”, Lviv, Ukraine
3
Department for Woman Health, Institute of Rural Health in Lublin, Poland
Corresponding author
Artur Wdowiak
Diagnostic Techniques Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016;23(1):174-181
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The phenomenon of deterioration of the quality of sperm in Poland and Ukraine has not been unequivocally evidenced by scientific research. Spermiogramms of males reporting for the first time to infertility treatment centres in both countries were examined, and trends in changes of selected sperm parameters analyzed during the period of study. Analyses covered the spermiograms of 6,278 men living in the examined regions for at least 3 years. It was found that mean sperm concentration of patients in the Lublin and the Lvov regions did not differ, but the total mean number of spermatozoa produced by Poles was higher than in Ukrainians. The quality of semen with respect to motility and sperm morphology was better in Ukrainian than Polish patients. Despite differences concerning concentration, the amount of sperm produced and percentage of spermatozoa showing progressive motility which occurred between individual years, no clear tendency was observed towards change of these parameters in a specified direction in both countries during the years examined. Among men examined in the Lublin Region, a tendency was noted towards decrease in the percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa in the ejaculate, while among patients from the Lvov Region an opposite tendency was observed.
REFERENCES (38)
1.
Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod. 2007; 22(6): 1506–12.
2.
Kiziler AR, Aydemir B, Onaran I, Alici B, Ozkara H, Gulyasar T, Akyolcu MC. High levels of cadmium and lead in seminal fluid and blood of smoking men are associated with high oxidative stress and damage in infertile subjects. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2007; 120 (1–3): 82–91.
3.
Leisegang K, Bouic PJ, Menkveld R, Henkel RR. Obesity is associated with increased seminal insulin and leptin alongside reduced fertility parameters in a controlled male cohort. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2014; 12(1): 34.
4.
Mehrpour O, Karrari P, Zamani N, Tsatsakis AM, Abdollahi M. Occupational exposure to pesticides and consequences on male semen and fertility: A review. Toxicol. 2014; pii: S0378–4274(14)00040-X.
5.
Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ 1992; 305(6854): 609–13.
6.
Andersson AM, Jørgensen N, Main KM, Toppari J, Rajpert-De Meyts E, et al. Adverse trends in male reproductive health: we may have reached a crucial ‘tipping point’. Int J Androl. 2008; 31(2): 74–80.
7.
Catanzariti F, Cantoro U, Lacetera V, Muzzonigro G, Polito M. Comparison between WHO (World Health Organization) 2010 and WHO 1999 parameters for semen analysis – interpretation of 529 consecutive samples. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013; 85(3): 125–9.
8.
Macaluso M, Wright-Schnapp TJ, Chandra A, Johnson R, Satterwhite CL. A public health focus on infertility prevention, detection, and management. Fertil. Steril. 2010; 93(1): 16.e1–10.
9.
Semczuk M, Kraczkowski J, Kalasiewicz J, Pakuła H, Franczak J. Wskaźniki morfologiczne nasienia mężczyzn z regionu lubelskiego w latach 1990–1994 (The morphology index of semen of men from Lublin Region between 1990 and 1994). Ginekol Pol. 1995; 66 supl. 2: 86–91.
10.
Pająk J, Heimrath J, Barwiński J. Zmiany w morfologicznym obrazie nasienia mężczyzn z bezdzietnych par małżeńskich, mieszkańców regionu dolnośląskiego w latach 1997–1993. Gin Pol. 1999; 70 (1): 20P.
11.
Olejek A, Tomanek G. Analiza niektórych parametrów nasienia męskiego w zależności od miejsca zamieszkania badanych w Poradni Leczenia Niepłodności w Bytomiu (Analysis some of semen parameters according to patients residence in the Infetrtility Outpatient Clinic in Bytom). Gin Prakt. 2005; 7: 8–13.
12.
Kozak M, Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A Bibliometric Study. Scientometrics. 2015; 102: 1101–1117.
13.
Rurik I, Kalabay L. Primary healthcare in the developing part of Europe: changes and development in the former Eastern Bloc countries that joined the European Union following 2004. Med Sci Monit. 2009; 15(7): PH78–84.
14.
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction, 4th edn.: World Health Organization; 1999.
15.
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 5th edn. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
16.
Swan SH, Elkin EP, Fenster L. The question of declining sperm density revisited: an analysis of 101 studies published 1934–1996. Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108(10): 961–966.
17.
Sripada S, Fonseca S, Lee A, Harrild K, Giannaris D, et al. Trends in semen parameters in the Northeast of Scotland. J Androl. 2007; 28: 313–319.
18.
Feki NC, Abid N, Rebai A, Sellami A, Ayed BB. Semen quality decline among men in infertile relationships: experience over 12 years in the South of Tunisia. J Androl. 2009; 30: 541–547.
19.
Rolland M, Le Moal J, Wagner V, Royere D, De Mouzon J. Decline in semen concentration and morphology in a sample of 26,609 men close to general population between 1989 and 2005 in France. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28: 462–470.
20.
Rasmussen PE, Erb K, Westergaard LG, Laursen SB. No evidence for decreasing semen quality in four birth cohorts of 1,055 Danish men born between 1950 and 1970. Fertil Steril. 1997; 68: 1059–1064.
21.
Liang XW, Lu WH, Chen ZW, Wang XH, Zhao H. Changes of semen parameters in Chinese fertile men in the past 25 Years [in chinese]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2008; 14: 775–778.
22.
Li G, Huang P, Ma HZ, Ge L, Xie Y, Wan QZ. Investigation on the sperm quality of 549 college students in Chengdu area. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2003; 9(9): 673–5, 678.
23.
Zhu XQ, Shen Y, Zhang XY, Chang Y, Huang XS. Trend analysis of sperm quality during the past 13 years in China [in Chinese]. J Zhejiang Univ. 2000; 29: 173–176.
24.
Tot G, Long M, Krüger T, Hjelmborg PS, Bonde JP. Semen quality in relation to xenohormone and dioxin-like serum activity among Inuits and three European populations. Environ Health Perspect. 2007; 115 Suppl 1: 15–20.
25.
Mocevic E, Specht IO, Marott JL, Giwercman A, Jönsson BA. Environmental mercury exposure, semen quality and reproductive hormones in Greenlandic Inuit and European men: a cross-sectional study. Asian J Androl. 2013; 15(1): 97–104.
26.
Bojar I, Witczak M, Wdowiak A. Biological and environmental conditionings for a sperm DNA fragmentation. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013; 20(4): 865–8.
27.
Sygit K, Kołłątaj W, Wojtyła A, Sygit M, Bojar I, Owoc A. Engagement in risky behaviours by 15–19-year-olds from Polish urban and rural areas. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18(2): 404–9.
28.
Wdowiak A, Lewicka M, Plewka K, Bakalczuk G. Nicotinism and quality of embryos obtained in in-vitro fertilization programmes. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013; 20(1): 82–5.
29.
Consales C, Leter G, Bonde JP, Tot G, Eleuteri P. Indices of methylation in sperm DNA from fertile men differ between distinct geographical regions. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29(9): 2065–72.
30.
Stronati A, Manicardi GC, Cecati M, Bordicchia M, Ferrante L. Relationships between sperm DNA fragmentation, sperm apoptotic markers and serum levels of CB-153 and p,p’-DDE in European and Inuit populations. Reproduction. 2006; 132(6): 949–58.
31.
Gibb H, Haver C, Kozlov K, Centeno JA, Jurgenson V. Biomarkers of mercury exposure in two eastern Ukraine cities. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2011; 8: 187–93.
32.
Lech T, Sadlik JK. Total mercury levels in human autopsy materials from a nonexposed Polish population. Arch Environ Health. 2004; 59: 50–4.
33.
Marzec Z, Schlegel-Zawadzka M. Exposure to cadmium, lead and mercury in the adult population from Eastern Poland, 1990–2002. Food Addit Contam. 2004; 21: 963–70.
34.
AMAP. Oslo; Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP); 2004. AMAP Assessment 2002: Heavy Metals in the Arctic.
35.
Andreucci A, Mocevic E, Jönsson BA, Giwercman A, Giwercman YL. Cadmium may impair prostate function as measured by Prostate Specififc Antigen in semen: a cross-sectional study among European and Inuit men. Reprod Toxicol. 2015; pii: S0890–6238(15)00011–8.
36.
Lenters V, Portengen L, Smit LA, Jönsson BA, Giwercman A. Phthalates, perfluoroalkyl acids, metals and organochlorines and reproductive function: a multipollutant assessment in Greenlandic, Polish and Ukrainian men. Occup Environ Med. 2014; pii: oemed-2014–102264.
37.
Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science. 2005; 308(5727): 1466–9.
38.
Fernández-González R, Moreira PN, Pérez-Crespo M, Sánchez-Martín M, Ramirez MA. Long-term effects of mouse intracytoplasmic sperm injection with DNA-fragmented sperm on health and behavior of adult offspring. Biol Reprod. 2008; 78: 761–772.