RESEARCH PAPER
Physical activity of Polish adolescents and young adults according to IPAQ: a population based study
More details
Hide details
1
John Paul II State Higher Vocational School, Biała Podlaska, Poland
2
Independent Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Public Health, University of Information Technology and Management, Rzeszow, Poland
4
Chief Sanitary Inspectorate, Warsaw, Poland; Institute of Haematology and Transfusion Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
5
Department of Functional Research, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
6
Department of Health Promotion, Food and Nutrition, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
Corresponding author
Andrzej Wojtyła
Department of Health Promotion, Food and Nutrition, Institute of Rural Health, Lublin, Poland
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2012;19(1):109-115
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The alarming problem of a decline in physical activity among children and adolescents and its detrimental effects on public health has been well recognised worldwide. Low physical activity is responsible for 6% of deaths worldwide and 5-10% of deaths in the countries of the WHO European Region, according to country. Within the last decade, many initiatives have been launched to counteract this phenomenon. The objective of presented study was analysis of the level of physical activity among adolescents and young adults in Poland, according to the IPAQ questionnaire. The study group covered 7,716 adolescents: 5,086 children attending high school and secondary schools and 2,630 university students. Low physical activity was noted among 57% of schoolchildren and 20.84% of students. Analysis of the level of physical activity according to the IPAQ indicated that it was lower among girls, compared to boys. An additional analysis, with the consideration of the place of residence, showed that the highest percentage of the population with low physical activity was noted in the rural areas (29.30%), while among the urban inhabitants of cities with a population above 100,000 it was on the level of 23.69% and 20.57%. Median for weekly physical activity by respondents gender was on the level of 1,554.00 MET*min. weekly among females, and 2,611.00 MET*min. weekly among males (p<0.000). The highest weekly physical activity expressed in MET*min. was observed among the inhabitants of towns with a population less than 100,000, whereas among the rural population and inhabitants of large cities with a population of over 100,000 the weekly physical activity was on a similar level (1,830.50 and 1,962.00 respectively). An extended analysis of respondents' physical activity showed that during the day students spend significantly more time in a sedentary position, compared to schoolchildren. The presented results of studies indicate the necessity to continue and intensify actions to promote various forms of physical activity among students and schoolchildren. A constant decrease in physical activity observed among children and adolescents suggests that it is necessary to pay greater attention to this social group while developing health programmes.
REFERENCES (59)
2.
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (PAGAC). Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report 2008. Washington, DC, US Department of Health and Human Services, 2008.
3.
Zatoński WA; HEM project team. Epidemiological analysis of health situation development in Europe and its causes until 1990. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18(2): 194-202.
4.
Garabrant DH, Peters JM, Mack TM, Bernstein L. Job activity and colon cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1984; 119(6): 1005-14.
5.
Woynarowska B. Aktywność fizyczna dzieci i młodzieży, Polskie Forum Profilaktyki Chorób Układu Krążenia (PFP) 2008; 3(12): 5.
6.
Manson JE, Skerrett PJ, Greenland P, VanItallie TB. The escalating pandemics of obesity and sedentary life style. A call to action for clinicians. Arch Intern Med. 2004; 164(3): 249-58.
7.
Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2009.
8.
The world health report 2002: reducing risk, promoting healthy life. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2002.
9.
Drygas W, Kwaśniewska M, Szcześniewska D, Kozakiewicz K, Głuszek J, Wiercinska E et al. Ocena poziomu aktywności fizycznej dorosłej populacji Polski. Wyniki Programu WOBASZ. Kard Pol. 2005; 63(4): 636-640.
10.
Wojnarowska B. Wybrane zagadnienia w sporcie dzieci i młodzieży. In: Medycyna Sportowa. Jegier A, Nazar K, Dziak A (ed.). PTMS Warszawa, 2006.p.174-233.
11.
Kołoło H. Poczucie własnej skuteczności, wsparcie społeczne i samoocena jako determinanty aktywności fizycznej młodzieży. Praca doktorska, AWF 2010.
12.
Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, Gutin B et al. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr. 2005; 146(6): 732-7.
13.
Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC et al. Physical activity and public health in older adults: Recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39(8): 1435-45.
14.
Prochaska JJ, Sallis JF, Long B. A physical activity screening measure for use with adolescents in primary care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001; 155(5): 554-9.
15.
Girard JR, Pate RR. Physical activity assessement In chldren and adolescent. Sports Med. 2001; 31(6): 439-54.
16.
Krysztofiak H, Mamcarz A, Kopeć G, Podolec P. Metody oceny aktywności fizycznej i wydolności fizycznej. Polskie Forum Profilaktyki Chorób Układu Krążenia (PFP) 2008; 3(12): 4-5.
17.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(8): 1381-95.
18.
Macfarlane DJ, Lee CC, Ho EY, Chan KL, Chan DT. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of IPAQ (short, last 7 days). J Sci Med Sport. 2007; 10(1): 45-51.
19.
Ekelund U, Sepp H, Brage S, Becker W, Jakes R, Hennings M et al. Criterion-related validity of the last 7-day, short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in Swedish adults. Public Health Nutr. 2006; 9(2): 258-65.
20.
Brown WJ, Trost SG, Bauman A, Mummery K, Owen N. Test-retest reliability of four physical activity measures used in population surveys. J Sci Med Sport. 2004; 7(2): 205-15.
21.
Woynarowska B, Mazur J, Kołoło H, Małkowska A. Zdrowie, zachowania zdrowotne i środowisko społeczne młodzieży w krajach Unii Europejskiej. UW, ImiDz, 2005.
22.
Janssen I. Physical activity guidelines for children and youth. Can J Public Health. 2007; 98 Suppl 2: S109-21.
23.
Janssen I, Leblanc A. Systematic Review of the Health Benefits of Physical Activity in School-Aged Children and Youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010; 7: 40.
24.
Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJ, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, Gutin B et al. Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. J Pediatr. 2005; 146(6): 732-6.
26.
Przewęda R, Dobosz J. Kondycja fizyczna polskiej młodzieży. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Warszawie. Studia i monografie, Warszawa, 2003.
27.
Sygit K, Nasiłowska-Barud A, Karwat ID, Gorczyca R, Jędrych M, Kołłątaj W. Selected social and health problems in functioning of disabled rural and urban inhabitants in the Lublin Region – similarities and differences. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2010; 17(2): 287-299.
29.
Wojtyła A, Kapka-Skrzypczak L, Biliński P, Paprzycki P. Physical activity among women at reproductive age and during pregnancy (Youth Behavioural Polish Survey – YBPS and Pregnancy-related Assessment Monitoring Survay – PrAMS) – epidemiological population studies in Poland during the period 2010-2011. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18(2): 365-374.
30.
Witana K, Szpak A. Uwarunkowania społeczno-ekonomiczne aktywności fizycznej młodzieży szkół średnich w Białymstoku. Probl Hig Epidemiol. 2009; 90(1): 42-46.
31.
Branca F, Nikogosian H, Lobstein T. (ed.) The challenge of obesity in the WHO European Region and the strategies for response. Summary. World Health Organization 2007.
http://www.euro.who.int/__data... (access: 2012.01.09).
32.
Jarosz M. (ed.) Zasady prawidłowego żywienia dzieci i młodzieży oraz wskazówki dotyczące zdrowego stylu życia, Wydawnictwo IŻŻ, Warszawa 2008.
http://wiemcojem.um.warszawa.p... (access: 2012.01.09).
33.
European Opinion Research Group EEIG, European Commission. Special Eurobarometer: physical activity, Special eurobarometer 183-6/Wave 58.2, Directorate General Health and Consumer Protection and Directorate General Press and Communication. 2003; 1–49.
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opi... (access: 2012.01.09).
34.
Haskell WL, Lee IM, Pate RR, Powell KE, Blair SN, Franklin BA et al. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39(8): 1423-34.
35.
Physical activity and health: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; 1996.
36.
Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, Sallis JF, Owen N, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Neighborhood SES and walkability are related to physical activity behaviour in Belgian adults. Prev Med. 2010; 50 Suppl 1: S74-9.
37.
Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from transportation, urban design and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 25(2): 80-91.
38.
Ewing R, Schmid T, Killingsworth R, Zlot A, Raudenbush S. Relationship between urban sprawl and physical activity, obesity and morbidity. Am J Health Promot. 2003; 18(1): 47-57.
39.
Wilcox S, Castro C, King AC, Housemann R, Brownson RC. Determinants of leisure time physical activity in rural compared with urban older and ethnically diverse women in the United States. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000; 54(9): 667-72.
40.
Reis JP, Bowles HR, Ainsworth BE, Dubose KD, Smith S, Laditka JN. Nonoccupational physical activity activity by degree of urbanization and US geographic region. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36(12): 2093-8.
41.
Eyler AA, Brownson RC, Bacak SJ, Housemann RA. The epidemiology of walking for physical activity in the United States. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(9): 1529-36.
42.
Denavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith JC. Census Bureau, current population reports, 60-236, income poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2008, U.S. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2009.
43.
Arnadottir SA, Gunnarsdottir ED, Lundin-Olsson L. Are rural older Icelanders less physically active than those living in urban areas? A population-based study. Scand J Public Health. 2009; 37(4): 409-17.
44.
Trost SG, Owen N, Bauman AE, Sallis JF, Brown W. Correlates of adults’ participation in physical activity: review and update. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002; 34(12): 1996-2001.
45.
Dyck DV, Cardon G, Deforche B, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Urban-rural differences in physical activity in Belgian adults and the importance of psychosocial factors. J Urban Health. 2011; 88(1): 154-67.
46.
Hoffmann K, Bryl W, Marcinkowski JT, Stróżyńska A, Pupek-Musialik D. Estimation of physical activity and prevalence of excessive body mass in rural and urban Polish adolescents. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18(2): 398-403.
47.
Ozdirenç M, Ozcan A, Akin F, Gelecek N. Physical fitness in rural children compared with urban children in Turkey. Pediatr Int. 2005; 47(1): 26-31.
48.
Proctor MH, Moore LL, Singer MR, Hood MY, Nguyen US, Ellison RC. Risk profiles for noncommunicable diseases in rural and urban schoolchildren in the Republic of Cameroon. Ethn Dis. 1996; 6(3-4): 235-43.
49.
Łobaszewski J, Przewoźniak K, Zatońska K, Wojtyła A, Bylina J, Mańczuk M et al. Patterns of leisure time physical activity and its determinants among a sample of adults from Kielce region, Poland – the ‘PONS’ study. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18(2): 241-245.
50.
Sygit K, Kołłątaj W, Wojtyła A, Sygit M, Bojar I, Owoc A. Engagement in risky behaviours by 15-19-year-olds from Polish urban and rural areas. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18(2): 404-409.
51.
De Cocker K, Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I. Pedometer-determined physical activity and its comparison with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire in a sample of Belgian adults. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007; 78(5): 429-37.
52.
Sigurdardottir AK, Arnadottir SA, Gunnarsdottir ED. Medication use among community-dwelling older Icelanders. Population-based study in urban and rural areas. Laeknabladid. 2011; 97(12): 675-80.
53.
Ng SW, Norton EC, Popkin BM. Why have physical activity levels declined among Chinese adults? Findings from the 1991-2006 China Health and Nutrition Surveys. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 68(7): 1305-14.
54.
Monda KL, Adair LS, Zhai F, Popkin BM. Longitudinal relationships between occupation and domestic physical activity patterns and body weight in China. Eur J Clin Nutr 2008; 62(11): 1318-25.
55.
Zatońska K, Janik-Koncewicz K, Regulska-Ilow B, Ilow R, Różańska D, Szuba A et al. Prevalence of obesity – baseline assessment in the prospective cohort ‘PONS’ study. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18(2): 246-250.
56.
Muntner P, Gu D, Wildman RP, Chen J, Qan W, Whelton PK, He J. Prevalence of physical activity among Chinese adults: results from the International Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease in Asia. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95(9): 1631-6.
57.
Xie G, Mai J, Zhao L, Liu X. Physical activity status of working time and its change over a ten-year period in Beijing and Guangzhou populations. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2008; 37(1): 33-6.
58.
Romundstad P, Janszky I, Vatten L, Håkon Bjørngård J, Langhammer A, Mańczuk M et al. Cancer risk factors in Poland: the PONS Study. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18(2): 251-4.
59.
Kołłątaj W, Sygit K, Sygit M, Karwat ID, Kołłątaj B. Eating habits of children and adolescents from rural regions depending on gender, education, and economic status of parents. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011; 18(2): 393-397.